The speaker criticizes the hypocrisy of Russian federal TV channels and wealthy individuals who collect charity from ordinary citizens, often using emotional appeals to help sick children. They argue that the state, which collects taxes from its citizens, should be responsible for funding medical treatments for its own citizens, rather than relying on charity. The speaker also suggests that wealthy individuals who want to do charity should donate from their own pockets rather than asking others for money. Additionally, they express a personal preference for donating to help seriously ill adults, who may have dependents and whose loss would affect more people, rather than solely focusing on helping sick children.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The speaker is criticizing the practice of collecting money for charity on federal TV channels.
2. The speaker mentions that the state has a budget and can allocate money for charity.
3. The speaker believes that wealthy individuals should donate money for charity out of their own pockets.
4. The speaker thinks that ordinary citizens should not be asked to donate money for charity when they are already paying taxes.
5. The speaker mentions that the state donates money to Syria and other countries, but does not provide sufficient funds for the treatment of sick children in Russia.
6. The speaker believes that the state should be responsible for providing medical treatment to its citizens, including children.
7. The speaker mentions that some charitable foundations, such as the Red Carnation, help veterans.
8. The speaker believes that charity work should be done without advertising or seeking praise.
9. The speaker mentions that they personally donate money to help people in need, but do not advertise it.
10. The speaker believes that adults who are seriously ill also need help and should not be forgotten.