Así me censuró YouTube - Summary

Summary

The content creator expresses frustration and disappointment with YouTube's handling of their video, which was removed and led to a penalty on their channel. The creator claims that YouTube's justification for the removal, citing discrimination against public figures, is unfounded and that the real reason is an 8-second footage of a person injecting their arm. However, this footage was downloaded from YouTube itself, and the original video is still available on the platform. The creator accuses YouTube of being corrupt, malicious, and incompetent, and of not providing clear explanations for their actions.

The creator also shares their personal experience with YouTube's appeals process, which they found to be slow and unresponsive. They claim that YouTube's employees are unhelpful and unempathetic, and that the platform's rules are unclear and subject to change.

The creator also mentions that they are part of a Telegram group with other big YouTubers, who share their negative experiences with YouTube. They express a sense of solidarity with other content creators who have been mistreated by the platform and call for a new platform that will treat creators with respect and fairness.

Overall, the content creator is highly critical of YouTube's policies and practices, and calls for change and accountability.

Facts

Here are the key facts from the text:

1. The speaker is a YouTube content creator who has experienced issues with the platform.
2. The speaker uploaded a video that was removed by YouTube for allegedly discriminating against certain public figures.
3. The video was about the excessive lifestyle and behavior of some public figures in France.
4. The speaker appealed the decision, but YouTube took almost a month to process and reject the appeal.
5. The reason given for the video's removal was that it contained 8 seconds of footage showing a person injecting their arm.
6. The footage was downloaded from a YouTube channel that offers free videos for content creators to use.
7. Despite the footage being available on YouTube, the speaker's video was removed and their channel was penalized.
8. The speaker is part of a Telegram group with other big YouTubers who have also had issues with YouTube.
9. The group was created to keep each other informed and alert about Google's actions.
10. The speaker believes that YouTube's actions are unfair and that the platform is ruining the experience for content creators.
11. The speaker has had previous experiences with Google technicians who have not been helpful or knowledgeable.
12. The speaker believes that YouTube is not sincere and plays dirty when it comes to enforcing its rules.
13. The speaker was censored by YouTube and received a warning that their channel could be demonetized.
14. The speaker compares YouTube's tactics to those used by authoritarian regimes, such as delaying answers and using passive-aggressive violence.
15. The speaker believes that content creators are disposable to YouTube and that the platform is trying to attract TikTok influencers instead.