КАК УНИЧТОЖИТЬ НАВАЛЬНОГО? - Summary

Summary

The speaker discusses how the Russian government's attempts to criticize and discredit Alexei Navalny, a Russian opposition leader, have been ineffective and even counterproductive. The speaker argues that the government's actions, such as banning Navalny from rallies and creating anti-Navalny propaganda videos, have only served to increase Navalny's popularity and martyrdom.

The speaker offers several suggestions on how the government could improve its strategy, including:

* Stop focusing on Navalny and instead focus on improving the government's own image and reputation.
* Create transparency in government and show that there is nothing to hide.
* Develop alternative opinion leaders and influencers who can counter Navalny's message.
* Liberate the internet and social media, rather than trying to restrict and control them.
* Create laws and policies that benefit the people, rather than just serving the interests of the government.

The speaker also notes that Navalny's popularity is not due to his charisma or message, but rather because he is seen as a voice of opposition to the government. The speaker concludes by saying that the government should focus on improving itself, rather than trying to discredit Navalny.

Facts

Here are the extracted facts:

1. The speaker is discussing Alexei Navalny, a Russian opposition leader.
2. Navalny's popularity increased after the release of a film.
3. The speaker describes Navalny as a "parasite" who earns an audience by criticizing the government.
4. The speaker believes that the government's attempts to suppress Navalny have backfired and increased his popularity.
5. The speaker suggests that the government should stop banning Navalny from rallies and films.
6. The speaker believes that the government's actions against Navalny have created a martyr complex around him.
7. The speaker suggests that the government should create transparency and show that they have nothing to hide.
8. The speaker believes that Navalny's rating is dependent on the government's actions.
9. The speaker suggests that the government should focus on creating positive change rather than trying to suppress Navalny.
10. The speaker mentions that Putin does not have a VKontakte page and is not active on social media.
11. The speaker suggests that the government should create a more liberal internet policy and reduce restrictions.
12. The speaker believes that video bloggers can be influential in shaping public opinion.
13. The speaker suggests that the government should find a charismatic person to create a channel and promote their views.
14. The speaker mentions that Navalny has never been an official and therefore cannot be held accountable for any actions.
15. The speaker believes that it is impossible to argue or debate with Navalny.
16. The speaker concludes that the government should focus on improving themselves rather than trying to belittle Navalny.

Note: I have excluded any opinions or subjective statements from the extracted facts, as per your request.