The speaker, a car owner and YouTube personality, recounts his experience with a tuning studio called "About Service" (managed by Dmitry Sannikov) where he had taken his Audi TT for customization. The project was supposed to take three months, but it took a year and a half to complete, and the car was returned in a subpar condition.
The speaker expresses his frustration and disappointment with the service, citing numerous issues with the car's exterior and interior, including a broken spoiler, rusty screws, and poor-quality interior work. He also mentions that the studio's owner, Dmitry, had asked him not to post any negative reviews about the service.
The speaker decides to expose the service's poor workmanship by showing the car's condition on his YouTube channel. He also invites others who have had similar experiences with the studio to share their stories.
Throughout the video, the speaker criticizes the studio's lack of professionalism, poor communication, and subpar work quality. He also accuses the studio's owner of being dishonest and trying to cover up the issues with the car.
The video ends with the speaker announcing that he will be gathering all the people who have been affected by the studio's poor service and will be creating another video to expose the issue further.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The owner of the car, Andrey, gave his Audi TT to a service center for tuning in February 2018.
2. The agreed-upon work was supposed to be completed within three months.
3. However, the service center took a year and a half to complete the work.
4. When Andrey received his car back, it was in a poor condition, with many problems, including a broken air duct, poor paint job, and faulty electrical systems.
5. The service center's owner, Dmitry Sannikov, had initially promised to complete the work within three months but failed to do so.
6. Andrey had paid a significant amount of money for the tuning, including 600,000 rubles for the spoiler.
7. The service center had also broken the car's headlight and had not replaced it.
8. Andrey's car was also fitted with low-quality wires and electrical components.
9. The service center's owner, Dmitry Sannikov, had claimed that the delays were due to problems with the 3D printer used for the body kit.
10. Andrey had to take his car to another service center to fix the problems caused by the first service center.
11. The second service center found many problems with the car, including a broken dashboard, faulty electrical systems, and poor paint job.
12. The owner of the second service center, Max, stated that the problems with Andrey's car were due to the first service center's poor workmanship and incorrect selection of hardware components.
13. Andrey plans to gather all the victims of the first service center and create another episode to highlight the problems with the service center.