Robert Bauval, an Egyptologist, used the Sky Globe program to study the layout of the Giza Pyramids and their alignment with the stars in Orion's Belt. He discovered that the layout of the Pyramids does not match the constellation of Orion at the commonly accepted date of 2500 B.C. However, when he used the program to go further back in time, he found a match between the Pyramids and Orion's Belt at around 10,500 B.C.
Bauval's theory is supported by the Turin papyrus, which lists over 340 Egyptian kings, and Manetho's documents, which suggest that the Egyptian civilization is much older than commonly accepted. The ostrich egg from the Nakkada Dynasty, dated to around 4500 B.C, also appears to depict the Giza Pyramids, further supporting the theory that the Pyramids are older than previously thought.
Despite the evidence, Bauval's theory has been met with resistance from academic Egyptologists, who have refused to debate the theory and have accused Bauval of being ignorant and attention-seeking. The theory is still officially dismissed, but it has gained popularity among some researchers and enthusiasts.
The implications of Bauval's theory are significant, suggesting that the age of the Egyptian civilization is much older than previously thought, and that the Pyramid builders may have been from a much earlier era. This challenges the conventional timeline of Egyptian history and suggests that the Pyramids may have been built before the Dynastic period.
Here are the key facts from the text:
1. Robert Bauval used a program called Sky Globe to study the stars and their movements in the past.
2. The Sky Globe program allowed users to see the location of the stars at any given time in history or in the future.
3. Bauval used the program to study the alignment of the Giza Pyramids with the stars in the constellation Orion.
4. Bauval found that the alignment of the pyramids with Orion's belt did not match the expected alignment if the pyramids were built around 2500 BC.
5. Bauval's research suggested that the pyramids may have been built at a different time than previously thought.
6. The Turin Papyrus, an ancient Egyptian document, lists the names of over 340 Egyptian kings and suggests that the Egyptian civilization may be older than previously thought.
7. The papyrus is estimated to have been written around 5867 BC, according to Champollion, who established the rules for decoding hieroglyphs.
8. Karl Lepsius, a German archeologist, later estimated the date of the papyrus to be around 3892 BC.
9. Auguste Mariette, the founder of the Egyptian museum, estimated the date to be around 5004 BC.
10. Dr. Brugsch, an Egyptian archeologist, estimated the date to be around 4400 BC.
11. The current estimate for the beginning of the Egyptian civilization is around 3200 BC.
12. The Turin Papyrus includes a list of kings that extends back to around 7000 years before the time of the papyrus.
13. Manetho, an Egyptian priest, wrote a book on the history of Egypt that included a timeline of the Egyptian civilization.
14. Manetho's book was lost, but excerpts were copied by other historians, including Eusebius of Caesarea.
15. According to Manetho, the Egyptian civilization extends back to around 30,000 BC.
16. The Turin Papyrus and Manetho's book both suggest that the Egyptian civilization may be older than previously thought.
17. Robert Bauval's theory that the pyramids were built to align with the stars in Orion's belt has been met with skepticism by some Egyptologists.
18. Bauval's theory suggests that the pyramids may have been built around 10,500 BC, rather than 2500 BC.
19. The carbon-14 dating method can only be used to determine the age of organic materials, not rocks.
20. The solar boats, potteries, and skeletons found around the pyramids have been dated to around 2500 BC to 3000 BC using the carbon-14 method.
21. An ostrich egg from the Nakkada Dynasty, dated to around 4500 BC, features a drawing of three pyramids that resemble the Giza Pyramids.
22. The egg also features a drawing of a river that resembles the Nile.
23. The official opinion is that the drawing on the egg is just a coincidence and does not represent the Giza Pyramids.
24. Many people, including amateurs and professionals, have suggested that the egg is proof that the pyramids are older than their announced age.