This is a review of a Russian film about Alexander Pushkin, written in a humorous and sarcastic tone. The reviewer is extremely critical of the film, calling it a "complete failure" and stating that it "insults the intelligence of the viewer." They mock the film's poor editing, acting, and plot, as well as its attempts to modernize Pushkin's story.
The reviewer notes that the film's portrayal of Pushkin is inaccurate and disrespectful, and that the movie's message is unclear. They also criticize the film's use of product placement and its attempt to appeal to a younger audience.
Throughout the review, the reviewer uses humor and irony to express their disappointment and frustration with the film. They also reference other films and cultural icons, such as "Pulp Fiction" and "Back to the Future," to highlight the movie's shortcomings.
Overall, the review is a scathing critique of the film, with the reviewer concluding that it is a waste of money and a disappointment to fans of Pushkin and Russian literature.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The Ministry of Culture and the Cinema Fund are involved in a project about Alexander Pushkin.
2. Pushkin is a great poet and a figure of Russian literature.
3. A film about Pushkin is being made, but the reviewer is critical of its production.
4. The film's plot involves time travel, with Pushkin being transported to the present day.
5. The reviewer criticizes the film's editing, acting, and plot holes.
6. The film features a schoolgirl who is a fan of Pushkin and helps him navigate the present day.
7. Pushkin's watch is a significant plot point in the film.
8. The reviewer mentions that the film is not faithful to Pushkin's life and works.
9. The film features a character named Dantes, who is involved in a duel with Pushkin.
10. The reviewer is critical of the film's production values, including the sound and editing.
11. The film features a cast of actors, including Kryukov and young people, but the reviewer is not impressed with their performances.
12. The reviewer mentions that the film did not do well in cinemas and that the money spent on it was wasted.
13. The reviewer quotes Vladimir Vysotsky's song "To the Poets", which mentions the number 37, a significant number in Russian literature.
14. The reviewer references other films and literature, including "Django", "Sherlock Holmes", and "Pulp Fiction".
15. The film's production team includes a screenwriter, director, and editors, but the reviewer is critical of their work.