A YouTube creator shares their personal experience with an astrology app, Astro Talk, which promises to provide guidance on various life issues, including job searches, health, and relationships. The creator, who claims to be a science-educated individual, intentionally provided false information to test the app's accuracy and expose its alleged fraudulent practices.
The creator initially contacted an astrologer through the app, providing false details about their job search and family life. The astrologer made generic and vague predictions, which the creator argues are not based on any actual astrological analysis. The creator then revealed their true intentions to the astrologer, who became defensive and tried to justify their methods.
The creator argues that apps like Astro Talk prey on people's emotional vulnerabilities, particularly those who are struggling with motivation or facing challenges in their lives. They claim that these apps use manipulative tactics to extract money from users, often by creating a sense of urgency or false hope.
The creator concludes by emphasizing the importance of critical thinking and not investing money in such apps, especially for those who are not financially stable. They encourage viewers to rely on their own abilities and seek guidance from trusted sources, rather than relying on unproven and potentially fraudulent services.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The author of the video had a fraud experience and decided to share it with their audience.
2. The author saw ads for Astro Talk, an astrology application, and decided to try it out.
3. The application offers free chats with astrologers, but only for a limited time.
4. The author gave correct information about themselves to the application.
5. The astrologers made predictions about the author's life, including their job prospects and marriage.
6. The author tested the application by providing false information and found that the predictions were incorrect.
7. The author spoke to two different astrologers on the application, Mohit and Ashok.
8. Ashok claimed to be a B.Tech qualified student and a physics teacher.
9. The author found that the application's predictions were based on general statements and not specific facts.
10. The application's business model is based on commission from users who recharge their accounts to continue chatting with astrologers.
11. The author rejected offers to promote the application on their channel.
12. The author advises their audience not to invest money in such applications, especially if they are not earning money themselves.