In an experiment to test the value of experience versus equipment in metal fabrication, three different-sized fabrication shops were hired to build simple box frames. Despite their varying levels of experience, all three shops failed to meet the specified dimensions and tolerances. In contrast, an animator with minimal welding experience succeeded in creating accurate frames by using a fixture table and following a provided plan. The experiment demonstrated that proper tools and equipment can compensate for lack of experience, leading to precise outcomes in fabrication tasks.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The video creator received negative comments on a previous video about building a simple frame.
2. Problems mentioned include bad saw cuts, warped surfaces, and human error.
3. The creator suggested using a fixture table to solve these problems.
4. Three fabrication shops of varying sizes were hired to build two simple box frames without knowing the creator's identity.
5. The frames required tight tolerances and 90-degree corners.
6. A checking system was created using a fireball fixture table to test the frames' dimensions.
7. Shop A used a steel table for construction.
8. Shop B used basic tools like saws and grinders.
9. Shop C promised d11 spec welding and an inspection report.
10. The frames were judged based on correct dimensions, flatness, and being a matching pair.
11. Shop A's frames were made from incorrect material and did not fit the dimension check system.
12. Shop B's frames were rusty, cheap, but failed in size and squareness.
13. Shop C's frames had correct weld placement but failed in size.
14. An inexperienced person, Drew, was also tasked to build a frame using a fixture table.
15. Drew's frames passed the dimension check and were nearly identical.
Please let me know if you need any more details or further assistance!