Here is a possible summary:
The speaker reviews the movie World War Z, which is based on a novel by Max Brooks. He criticizes the movie for being a disappointing adaptation that deviates from the book's premise of a global war against zombies. He points out the movie's plot holes, script rewrites, and dull ending. He also reflects on the popularity of the zombie genre in the early 2010s and how it faded over time. He briefly mentions Brooks's other works and jokes about a possible Minecraft movie.
Here are some key facts extracted from the text. I numbered them and kept them short sentences as you requested.
1. The text is about the movie World War Z and how it differs from the novel by Max Brooks.
2. The movie was released in 2013 and starred Brad Pitt as a former UN investigator who tries to stop the zombie apocalypse.
3. The movie had a troubled production, with multiple rewrites, reshoots, and conflicts between Pitt and the director.
4. The movie was criticized for being a bad adaptation of the novel, which was an anthology of survivors' stories during the zombie war.
5. The movie was also criticized for being a bad movie, with plot holes, dull scenes, and a nonsensical solution to the zombie threat.
6. The movie was the last major zombie blockbuster of the early 2010s, which was a period of high popularity for the zombie genre.
7. Max Brooks continued to write novels after World War Z, including Devolution and three Minecraft books.