A possible concise summary is:
The speaker reviews the movie The Cloverfield Paradox and criticizes it for being poorly written, illogical, and inconsistent. He compares it unfavorably to the previous movies in the series and mocks its attempts to explain the origin of the monsters. He points out several plot holes, contradictions, and nonsensical scenes in the movie and expresses his frustration with the ending. He concludes that the movie is entertaining only because it is stupid and that he saved the viewer from wasting their time watching it.
Here are some key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a review of the movie The Cloverfield Paradox, which is a sci-fi thriller set in the Cloverfield universe.
2. The reviewer criticizes the movie for being lazy, uninspired, confusing, and inconsistent, and for having poorly developed characters and plot.
3. The movie is about a group of astronauts who accidentally merge with an alternate universe while trying to generate infinite energy with a particle accelerator, and unleash monsters on Earth.
4. The movie reveals the origin of the monsters in the previous Cloverfield movies, but the reviewer thinks that this was unnecessary and poorly executed.
5. The movie has two narratives: one on the space station and one on Earth, but the reviewer thinks that they are not well connected and that the Earth storyline is pointless.
6. The movie has many scenes that are supposed to be mysterious or horrifying, but the reviewer thinks that they are silly and nonsensical, and that they are never explained or resolved.
7. The movie ends with a giant Cloverfield monster appearing on Earth, which the reviewer thinks is insulting and downplays everything that happened in the movie.
8. The reviewer thinks that the Cloverfield series is hurting itself by trying to connect unrelated movies with a weak premise, and that this movie is worse than the previous ones.