A possible concise summary is:
The text is a transcript of a video from Food Theory, a YouTube channel that investigates food-related topics. The video discusses the controversy over Subway's tuna sandwiches, which have been accused of not containing real tuna. The video analyzes the results of different lab tests that tried to identify tuna DNA in the sandwiches, and explains why they are inconclusive or unreliable. The video also criticizes the media coverage of the issue and defends Subway's claims. The video is sponsored by HelloFresh, a meal kit delivery service.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. A lab test found no amplifiable tuna DNA in Subway's tuna sandwich sample.
2. The lawsuit filed in January against Subway claimed their tuna was not actual tuna.
3. The accusers did not provide the lab report or name of the lab that performed the test.
4. Subway was predicted to be serving real tuna and to be unaffected by the lawsuit.
5. The New York Times conducted their own lab test which also did not find tuna DNA in Subway's tuna.
6. The New York Times sent cooked tuna for testing, which can destroy DNA.
7. Inside Edition conducted a similar test and found tuna DNA in Subway's sandwiches.
8. Subway claims it uses two types of tuna in its sandwiches: skipjack and yellowfin.
9. There are 15 different species of fish that can legally be sold as tuna in the US.
10. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Please let me know if you need any further information or clarification on these points.