The summary is:
The speaker is a lawyer who is defending his wife in a lawsuit filed by Sberbank. He challenges one of the judges for grinning contemptuously at his wife when she objected to the bank's motion to present new evidence. He also challenges the rest of the judicial panel for refusing to satisfy his challenge and for being biased and interested in the outcome of the case. He claims that the bank did not prove its case in the first instance and that the sheets of paper it presented are not valid documents. He criticizes the judge's behavior and says that he will file a complaint and appeal to the Supreme Court. He says that he lost the case, but he also told the truth to the judges and defended his honor and dignity.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. Sberbank filed a lawsuit against the user's wife and did not present any evidence to the court of first instance.
2. The user filed an appeal and the bank decided to present evidence to substantiate its position in the second instance.
3. The user objected to the evidence presented by the bank as irrelevant, inadmissible and untimely.
4. The user challenged one of the judges of the judicial panel, Judge Idi Goreva, for expressing contempt to the defendant and the user.
5. The user also challenged the remaining judges of the judicial panel for refusing to satisfy the application for recusal and for being personally interested in the outcome of the case.
6. The user lost the appeal but claimed that he defended his honor and dignity.