The summary is:
A journalist and a driver's representative confronts a traffic police inspector who stopped a driver for allegedly violating the traffic rules. The journalist demands to see the evidence of the violation and refuses to show the driver's license and registration document. The inspector insists that he followed the procedure and explained the reason for the stop. The journalist accuses the inspector of falsifying the protocol and taking bribes. The inspector calls for backup and tries to calm down the situation. The journalist records the conversation with a camera and argues with the inspector about the law. The driver remains silent and does not show his documents. The inspector shows his certificate and asks for the driver's name and date of birth. The journalist says he will protect the driver to the last. The inspector says he wants to see the evidence of his guilt. The journalist says he did not know what the evidence was until he arrived. The inspector says he has everything in his computer. The journalist says he wants to see it on the spot. The inspector says he needs to check the driver's identity and vehicle registration. The journalist says he has the law in his glove compartment. The inspector says he has it too. The journalist says he is not a driver, but a representative. The inspector says he wants to talk to the driver. The driver says he is not a driver, but a representative. The inspector says he wants to see his driver's license and registration document. The journalist says he wants to see the proof of the violation. The inspector says he has witnesses who saw the driver speeding and turning in the wrong way. The journalist says that is nonsense and asks for proof. The inspector says he has it in his computer. The journalist says he wants to see it on the spot. The inspector says he needs to draw up a report and asks for the driver's name and date of birth again. The journalist says he will not give it until he sees the proof. The inspector says he will call back in two hours and asks him to come and meet him. The journalist says he wants to see it on the spot. The inspector gives up and lets them go, but warns them to be careful on the road and not to drink alcohol while driving.
Some possible facts extracted from the text are:
- The text is a transcript of a video where a driver is stopped by a traffic police inspector in Ukraine.
- The driver refuses to show his driver's license and registration document to the inspector.
- The driver has a representative who is a journalist and who argues with the inspector about the legality of the stop and the evidence of the violation.
- The inspector claims that the driver violated the traffic rules by turning in the wrong direction and that he has witnesses and a computer to prove it.
- The driver and his representative demand to see the proof and the law that allows the inspector to stop them.
- The inspector calls for backup and tries to identify the driver by his name and date of birth.
- The driver eventually shows his documents and is allowed to leave with a warning.