The summary is:
A person named Dolgikh Anton Vitalievich is having a heated argument with a bailiff in the Kirov regional court. The bailiff accuses him of videotaping the court hearing, which is prohibited, and tries to take him to the duty room. Dolgikh denies that he was videotaping and claims that he only took a photo of the place where he was not allowed to sit. He also says that he is making an audio recording of the conversation and that he has called the duty officer of the FSB to report a crime. He challenges the bailiff to prove that he was videotaping and argues that the ban on filming in the courthouse is illegal. He also mentions that he is a participant in a court hearing that has a break until 14:00 and that he is an opposition candidate for the legislative assembly. He thanks another bailiff named Vitya for pushing the first bailiff out and says that he will stand for him. He also talks about his son Nikitushka who does Greco-Roman wrestling and says that he needs to get back together for the case.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The speaker, Dolgikh Anton Vitalievich, is a participant in a court hearing in the Kirov regional court.
2. A break has been announced in the court hearing until 14:00.
3. The speaker claims to be making an audio recording, but not a video recording.
4. The speaker states that permission from the presiding judge is required for video recording in the courthouse.
5. The speaker mentions that they have been refused permission to sit at an empty table and to release video recordings publicly.
6. The speaker claims that the bailiff is trying to intimidate them and is exceeding his official powers.
7. The speaker asks the bailiff to stop the offense and violation of their rights.
8. The speaker mentions that they have filed a crime report with the duty officer in the Kursk region.
9. The speaker discusses the ban on video recording in the courthouse and claims it is a controversial provision.
10. The speaker mentions that they are familiar with the rules of conduct in the courthouse.
11. The speaker claims that the chairman of the court has exceeded his powers by adopting the ban on video recording.
12. The speaker mentions that they will dispute the question of the legality of the ban on video recording and may take it to the Supreme Court.
13. The speaker thanks the bailiff for their adequate position in a difficult situation.
14. The speaker mentions that they have a friend who is a stranger to them and does not owe them money.
15. The speaker questions why they need to deal with problems that have arisen out of the blue.
16. The speaker mentions that they are not looking for confrontation, but will defend themselves if necessary.