The following is a possible concise summary of the text:
The text is a review of the Mario movie by a YouTube channel called Shaperless. The reviewer is a big fan of the Mario games and enjoyed the movie for its fun action scenes and references, despite its weak plot and characters. He acknowledges that critics and non-fans may not like the movie as much, but he thinks it's fine to have different opinions. He also criticizes some of the licensed music choices and the lack of screen time for Luigi and Bowser. He gives the movie a 7 out of 10 and urges people to stop harassing others for their views on the movie. He ends the review with a sponsored segment for Squarespace, a website builder service.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a review of the Mario movie by Illumination.
2. The reviewer is a Mario super fan who enjoyed the movie despite its flaws.
3. The reviewer gave the movie a 7 out of 10 rating and said it was the second best film by Illumination after Despicable Me 1.
4. The reviewer criticized the movie for having a bare bones plot, weak character development, and unfitting licensed music.
5. The reviewer praised the movie for having fun action set pieces, good instrumental score, and deep cut references to the Mario games.
6. The reviewer also liked the performances of Charlie Day as Luigi and Jack Black as Bowser, but disliked Fred Armisen as Cranky Kong.
7. The reviewer asked people to stop harassing others for not liking the movie and to respect different opinions.
8. The text ends with an advertisement for Squarespace, a website builder service.
Is this what you were looking for? 😊