This is a summary of the following:
The speaker is a video game reviewer who is reviewing various Star Wars games from different consoles and eras. He starts with the Atari 2600 games, which he finds mediocre and inaccurate to the movies. He then moves on to the Famicom and NES games, which he finds extremely difficult and frustrating. He praises the SNES games for their graphics, music and variety, but still complains about their difficulty. He ends with the Nintendo 64 game Shadows of the Empire, which he considers a breakthrough for Star Wars games. He also makes jokes about other hypothetical Star Wars games with ridiculous titles. The summary is:
The reviewer criticizes the Atari, Famicom and NES Star Wars games for being poorly designed, hard and unfaithful to the movies. He likes the SNES games better, but still finds them annoyingly hard. He admires the Nintendo 64 game for its realism and originality. He also makes humorous references to other imaginary Star Wars games.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a transcript of a video by the Angry Video Game Nerd, a web series that reviews bad video games.
2. The text covers several Star Wars games for different platforms, such as Atari 2600, NES, SNES and N64.
3. The text criticizes the games for being inaccurate, difficult, frustrating or boring, and makes jokes and references to the movies and other media.
4. The text uses a lot of profanity, such as [ __ ], [ __ ] and [ __ ], which are censored in the transcript.
5. The text ends abruptly with a buffalo crashing into the narrator's window and leaving a mess of [ __ ] and glass.