Here is a possible concise summary:
The speaker compares the subversion of expectations in two films by Rian Johnson: The Last Jedi and Knives Out. He argues that the former failed to deliver satisfying twists because they broke the rules of good subversion: enhancing the story, having verisimilitude, and keeping promises. He praises the latter for successfully subverting the genre, the tropes, and the clues in a clever and engaging way. He also recommends some audiobooks on writing from Audible.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a transcript of a video about how to do a plot twist and subvert expectations correctly, using Knives Out and The Last Jedi as examples.
2. The video argues that Knives Out is a better example of subversion than The Last Jedi because it follows three rules: it enhances the story going forward, it has a strong verisimilitude with the story's logic, and it keeps the promises made to the audience.
3. The video praises Knives Out for its genre switch from a whodunit to a how-to-get-away-with-it, its clever use of foreshadowing and clues, and its satisfying resolution of both plot lines.
4. The video criticizes The Last Jedi for its subversions that go against the character's motivations, lack logical sense, and break the promises made in The Force Awakens.
5. The video is sponsored by Audible and recommends two audiobooks: Save the Cat and Save the Cat Writes a Novel.