The following is a concise summary of the text:
The text is a transcript of a video that gives advice on how to avoid administrative responsibility for traffic violations in Russia. The speaker suggests writing certain phrases in the protocol that the traffic police inspector draws up, such as denying the offense, requesting a lawyer, asking to consider the case at the place of residence, and attaching petitions. The speaker claims that these phrases can help ruin the case because the traffic police inspectors often ignore them or make procedural errors. The speaker also recommends recording the conversation, checking the copy of the protocol, and appealing the decision in court if necessary. The speaker says that this is a legal way to use one's procedural rights and that the traffic police inspectors are poorly trained in the law.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a transcript of a video that gives advice on how to avoid administrative responsibility for traffic violations in Russia.
2. The text suggests that drivers should record the conversation with the traffic police inspector, deny the phone number and SMS notification, and write certain explanations and petitions in the protocol.
3. The text claims that the traffic police inspectors often violate the rights and obligations of drivers and witnesses, and that these violations can be used to appeal the case in court or higher authority.
4. The text refers to several articles of the Constitution and the Code of Administrative Offenses, as well as other videos on the same topic.
5. The text advises drivers to check if the copy of the protocol is identical to the original, and to take a photo of the protocol before giving it back to the inspector.