The text is a transcript of a video where the speaker talks about the rivalry between two Brazilian podcast channels: Flow and Can Stop. He explains how Flow helped Can Stop in the beginning by providing them with equipment, studio, guests, and sponsorship, but Can Stop later became ungrateful and arrogant after surpassing Flow in numbers and popularity. He also criticizes Can Stop for mocking Flow and buying the domain of their catchphrase. He says he understands how Flow feels betrayed and hurt by Can Stop's ingratitude and disrespect. He ends by congratulating Can Stop for their success, but saying it's ugly to see them forget who helped them get there.
Some possible concise summaries are:
- A video commentary on the feud between two podcast channels that started as friends but turned into enemies after one surpassed the other with their help.
- How a podcast channel betrayed and mocked the one that helped them grow and become successful in a video rant.
- The story of a podcast rivalry fueled by ingratitude, arrogance, and mockery.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
- The text is a transcript of a video about the rivalry between two podcast channels in Brazil: Flow and Can Stop.
- Flow is an older and more established podcast channel that helped Can Stop get started by lending them their studio, equipment, and contacts.
- Can Stop grew rapidly and surpassed Flow in terms of subscribers and views, and started to mock and belittle Flow's work.
- Flow felt betrayed and ungrateful by Can Stop's attitude and responded by criticizing their content and quality.
- The text contains several opinions, jokes, and insults from both sides, as well as references to other podcasters and YouTubers.
Here are the facts numbered and in short sentences:
1. The text is a transcript of a video about the rivalry between two podcast channels in Brazil: Flow and Can Stop.
2. Flow helped Can Stop get started by lending them their studio, equipment, and contacts.
3. Can Stop grew rapidly and surpassed Flow in terms of subscribers and views.
4. Can Stop mocked and belittled Flow's work.
5. Flow felt betrayed and ungrateful by Can Stop's attitude and responded by criticizing their content and quality.
6. The text contains opinions, jokes, insults, and references from both sides.