A possible concise summary is:
The user talks about how Brent Rivera, a popular YouTuber, has been abusing the copyright system to take down videos that criticize him for his behavior at a haunted hotel. The user explains how Brent Rivera or someone close to him filed false claims against another YouTuber named Dumpy, who made fun of Brent for his actions. The user argues that Brent Rivera is wrong, childish and thin-skinned, and that he should have apologized and moved on instead of making the situation worse. The user also praises YouTube for siding with Dumpy and not giving him any strikes. The user ends by expressing frustration and disdain for Brent Rivera or whoever is representing him.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. Brent Rivera is a YouTuber who makes videos for children and was involved in some drama with another YouTuber named Tyler Oliveira.
2. Brent Rivera or someone representing him filed copyright takedown requests on some videos that were critical of him, such as those made by a commentary channel named Dumpy.
3. YouTube sided with Dumpy and did not give him any strikes or take down his videos.
4. The questions and answers that Brent Rivera or his representative provided to YouTube were poorly written, false, and did not justify the takedown requests.
5. The video argues that Brent Rivera's actions were wrong, cowardly, and damaging to his reputation.