A possible concise summary is:
The speaker analyzes the discrepancy between critics and audiences in their ratings of the Mario movie on Rotten Tomatoes. They argue that critics and audiences have different expectations, tastes, and experiences that affect their opinions. They also suggest that some studios may benefit from creating a conflict narrative between critics and audiences. They recommend finding and following reviewers who share similar preferences and perspectives as oneself. They end by promoting their other videos on the Mario movie and asking for subscribers.
Some possible facts extracted from the text are:
1. The Super Mario movie has a 59% critic score and a 96% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, creating a 37 point difference.
2. The Super Mario movie is produced by Universal and Nintendo, and is aimed at a kid's audience with colorful animation, fun action, and nostalgia.
3. Critics tend to prefer movies that are original, complex, and challenging, while audiences tend to enjoy movies that are familiar, entertaining, and nostalgic.
4. Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Fandango Media, which is jointly owned by Warner Brothers Discovery and NBC Universal, who are also major film studios.
5. The Super Mario movie is using its high audience score to market itself against the critics, creating an us-versus-them narrative that benefits the studios and the website.
6. The reviewer recommends finding and following film reviewers whose personal tastes align with one's own, and mentions Jeremy Jahns, Chris Stuckmann, and Dan Murrell as examples.