The summary is:
The speaker is a YouTube content creator who expresses his frustration and criticism of reaction videos, especially those made by Jinx. He argues that reaction videos are lazy, unoriginal, unfair, and harmful to the original creators. He also responds to some of the common defenses and excuses that reactionists use, such as crediting the source, following the requests of the viewers, and avoiding jokes about serious topics. He questions the value and purpose of reaction videos and wonders why people are so accepting of them. He also makes some jokes and sarcastic remarks along the way. He ends by asking his audience to give him a good reason for reaction videos and saying that he is busy with moving house.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The text is a transcript of a video by I Hate Everything, a YouTube channel that criticizes various topics and trends.
2. The video is titled "I HATE REACTION VIDEOS" and was uploaded on October 30, 2015.
3. The video expresses the author's dislike and frustration with reaction videos, a genre of videos where people record themselves watching other videos and provide minimal commentary or input.
4. The video specifically targets Jinx, a popular reactionist who has been involved in controversies and debates with other YouTubers such as Jacksfilms, GradeAUnderA and iDubbbzTV.
5. The video argues that reaction videos are lazy, unoriginal, unfair, harmful and illogical, and that they abuse the YouTube system and the fair use law.
6. The video also responds to some of the common defenses and criticisms that reactionists and their fans use, such as crediting the original creators, taking requests from the comments, providing entertainment value, avoiding hate speech and respecting serious issues.
7. The video ends with a sarcastic apology and a humorous outro where the author mocks the reaction genre and its audience.
Is this what you were looking for? 😊