Actually the first Space Jam kinda sucked too - Summary

Summary

The video is a review of the movie "Space Jam 2" by Drew Gooden. The review starts with a discussion about the movie's target audience, which Gooden suggests is primarily children, but the script is too simplistic for adults to enjoy. He criticizes the movie for being overly referential and messy, and for its dark violence. Gooden also criticizes the movie for its length and lack of solid animation.

He then reviews "Space Jam 1", praising its humor and the performances of the characters, but criticizing its plot and the portrayal of Michael Jordan. He also criticizes the movie's depiction of basketball and the characters' relationships.

Gooden concludes by discussing the potential for a "Space Jam 3", which he mentions is already in theaters. He expresses skepticism about the movie's quality and predicts that it will be another disappointment. He ends the review by promoting his own website, pictureofhotdog.com, which sells high-resolution prints of a hotdog signed by the hotdog. He also promotes Squarespace, a website builder, and gives a promo code for a 10% discount on the first purchase.

Facts

1. The speaker is discussing a movie called "Space Jam 2".
2. The speaker criticizes the movie for being a "massive cash cow" and being "genetically engineered" for profit.
3. The speaker mentions that the movie is targeted at kids, but also criticizes it for being too dumb for adults to laugh at.
4. The speaker critiques the movie for its overly referential and cynical marketing strategy.
5. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "messy" and "all over the place" script.
6. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
7. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
8. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
9. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
10. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
11. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
12. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
13. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
14. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
15. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
16. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
17. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
18. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
19. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
20. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
21. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
22. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
23. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
24. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
25. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
26. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
27. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
28. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
29. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
30. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential" and "cynical" marketing strategy.
31. The speaker criticizes the movie for being "mildly enjoyable" to watch or make fun of, but also criticizes it for being 115 minutes long.
32. The speaker criticizes the movie for its "overly referential