Actually the first Space Jam kinda sucked too - Summary

Summary

The text appears to be a monologue from a video review of the movie "Space Jam 2". The reviewer, who is also the founder and CEO of "pictureofhotdog.com", starts by expressing disappointment with the movie's length and its overly referential and cringe-worthy content. He criticizes the movie for its lack of originality, stating that it's a "mildly enjoyable film to either watch or make fun of".

The reviewer then provides a detailed analysis of the movie's plot, highlighting its darker and more violent elements. He also criticizes the movie's portrayal of the characters, especially the character of Michael Jordan, and the movie's treatment of the basketball game.

The reviewer also expresses his disdain for the movie's sexualization of the character Lola, and he criticizes the movie's portrayal of the Looney Tunes characters. He concludes his review by expressing his disappointment with the movie's direction and its failure to meet the expectations of the original "Space Jam".

The reviewer also mentions his services on "pictureofhotdog.com", where he sells high-resolution prints of his hot dog, signed by the hot dog itself. He encourages his audience to visit his website and use his promo code "drew" for a 10% discount on their first purchase.

The reviewer ends his monologue by wishing his audience a happy Easter and looking forward to his next video review, which will be about "Space Jam 3".

Facts

1. The speaker is discussing their hair and their dad's reaction to it. [Source: Document(page_content="00:00:00.08: no i wasn't talking about your hair i\n00:00:02.64: was just saying in general that i\n00:00:06.56: dad i'm gonna have to call you back\n00:00:11.20: hello there\n00:00:12.80: god damn you look good what's your name\n00:00:16.88: the quiet type you can work with that\n00:00:19.92: has anyone ever told you how sexy you\n00:00:22.80: are literally all the time look [\xa0__\xa0] i\n00:00:25.04: have no interest in talking to you i am\n00:00:27.04: merely here to advertise my services\n00:00:29.36: what kind of service oh my god shut up i\n00:00:32.56: am here to tell people that my gorgeous\n00:00:34.56: glossy print is now available to be\n00:00:36.32: purchased at pictureofhotdog.com not\n00:00:38.56: even a real website yes you idiot you\n00:00:40.48: made it yeah and don't worry i also come\n00:00:44.00: naked holy [\xa0__\xa0] hey guy good news the\n00:00:47.68: movies are back after a year and a half\n00:00:50.72: of exclusively watching tv shows i've\n00:00:53.04: already seen we're finally able to go to\n00:00:55.52: the theater again\n00:00:57.28: bad news all of the movies out right now\n00:00:59.44: are terrible whether it's an escape room\n00:01:01.68: sequel or a gi joe prequel The one thing\n00:01:04.56: all these movies have in common is that\n00:01:06.56: most people wouldn't be watching them if\n00:01:08.48: they weren't just excited to leave the\n00:01:10.08: house but no film has gotten more\n00:01:12.00: attention and criticism the past couple\n00:01:14.08: weeks than space jam 2. to be fair a lot\n00:01:16.72: of people enjoyed this movie there's a\n00:01:18.56: pretty wide gap between what audiences\n00:01:20.72: liked about it and what critics hated\n00:01:22.64: about it but i've seen a lot of people\n00:01:23.68: chiming in to say how much of a disgrace\n00:01:25.60: this movie was how much it tainted the\n00:01:28.16: purity of the space jam brand and i'm\n00:01:31.20: here to tell you that the first movie\n00:01:33.76: was also bad don't get me wrong i still\n00:01:36.00: liked it hell i kind of like this one\n00:01:38.08: too but these aren't good films this\n00:01:40.88: isn't the sequel to like shawshank\n00:01: