The video, presented by Susipe Pires, discusses the implications of Article 13 of the European Union, a proposed law that could significantly alter the internet as we know it, especially in Europe. The law, if implemented, could result in the shutdown of major social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram, as they would be forced to pay high costs to prevent copyright infringement cases. The video also highlights the issue of Article 11, which, if passed, would force internet indexers to pay for linking to journalistic articles, potentially shutting down Google News.
The video warns that the intention behind these laws is not to protect authors' rights but to break the internet. The speaker argues that these laws, especially if they become a model for other countries, could lead to a dystopian future where the internet ceases to exist as we know it. The speaker suggests that the only chance to prevent this is through large-scale online mobilizations and protests, and that individuals should take the message to adults in their communities to educate them about the potential consequences of these laws.
The video also criticizes YouTube's Content ID system for being unfair and unjust, as it disproportionately benefits copyright holders while leaving content creators with little to no revenue. The speaker suggests that this system is the worst thing on the internet today and argues that it is a major reason why content creators are struggling.
Finally, the video suggests that politicians who are considering implementing similar laws in other countries should take note of the situation in Europe, where the internet is significantly less developed than in the United States or Brazil. The speaker warns that if these laws are implemented in countries like Brazil, the internet would cease to function, leaving users with limited access to online content.
1. The speaker is Susipe Pires, a team member of Francisca Batista for gossip.
2. The video is serious but the speaker plans to make it as funny as possible.
3. The video is about a situation that is very important, specifically the Article 13 of the European Union.
4. Article 13 aims to protect copyright, which could change the internet as we know it.
5. The speaker believes that Europe and other countries will start to shut down their internet if this law is applied.
6. The law could affect all social networks and the entire internet, not just YouTube.
7. The speaker believes that content creators will not be able to host videos without risking being sued.
8. The speaker is concerned that the internet in Europe will basically cease to exist.
9. The speaker believes that the law's intention is to break the internet, not to protect the author's rights.
10. The speaker believes that the law is being pushed by old media corporations, not by the intention to protect authors' rights.
11. The speaker is concerned that the law will affect not only YouTube but also other platforms like Google News and Google Images.
12. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for YouTube to take any risk with third-party videos.
13. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for YouTube to pay for all the images on Google Images.
14. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for Google Images to exist because it cannot buy all the images in the world.
15. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for anyone to display any image on the internet.
16. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for anyone to search for an image on the internet.
17. The speaker believes that the law could make it impossible for anyone to post any comment on the internet.
18. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like it did in the year 1.0.
19. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without images.
20. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without comments.
21. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without images and comments.
22. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog.
23. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on.
24. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments.
25. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features.
26. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features, and without any images.
27. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features, and without any images, and without any posts or comments.
28. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features, and without any images, and without any posts or comments, and without any posts.
29. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features, and without any images, and without any posts or comments, and without any posts, and without any comments.
30. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted or commented on, without images, and without comments, and without any interactive features, and without any images, and without any posts or comments, and without any posts, and without any comments, and without any interactive features.
31. The speaker believes that the law could make the internet in Europe look like a culinary blog without anything that can be posted