Why are Farmers Protesting? | Farm Laws Explained | Dhruv Rathee - Summary

Summary

The video discusses the recent protests by farmers in Punjab and Haryana against the government's new ordinances related to agriculture. The ordinances propose to create a "one nation, one market" system, allowing farmers to sell their produce wherever they wish, without regulations such as the Minimum Support Price (MSP) that was previously enforced in Agriculture Produce Market Committees (APMCs). This has led to widespread protests, with farmers fearing the potential loss of MSP and the possible corporatization of the agricultural sector.

The video also explains the history of the APMC system, which was established to protect farmers from exploitation by moneylenders and traders. The MSP was introduced as an incentive for farmers to remain in cultivation, and the APMC system was a significant part of India's green revolution in the 1960s.

However, the video criticizes the APMC system for developing flaws over time, such as cartelization and the formation of mafias. The video also highlights that only a small percentage of farmers receive MSP, and most are dependent on the markets.

The video concludes by emphasizing the need to make the APMC system stronger and to ensure that farmers have an assured income. This could be achieved by improving the APMC system, investing more in agriculture, and considering the return of farmers to the cities. The video also encourages viewers to support the farmers' demands and to subscribe to Disney Plus Hotstar VIP for uninterrupted IPL matches.

Facts

1. The farmers of Punjab and Haryana are protesting against three recently introduced ordinances related to agriculture. This protest has been dubbed the "tractor protest" due to farmers riding tractors to the site of protest.

2. The "Save the mandis" slogan refers to the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) system. APMC is a system where the government controls traders and farmers through a licensing system, aiming to safeguard farmers from exploitation by moneylenders and traders.

3. The APMC system was a significant factor in India's Green Revolution in the 1960s. It involves farmers bringing their produce to APMC-regulated mandis, where private trade can purchase it. If no private trade buys the produce, the government steps in to procure it at a Minimum Support Price (MSP).

4. The ordinances introduced by the Modi government claim to create "one nation, one market" and provide farmers with freedom of choice. However, farmers argue that this could disadvantage them, as transactions outside APMC mandis are not regulated and there is no MSP outside these mandis.

5. The protesting farmers believe the ordinances would corporatize the agricultural sector of India, allowing big companies to exploit farmers. They argue that the freedom to sell produce anywhere is not practical for farmers who cannot travel to sell their produce.

6. The issue of free markets vs regulated markets is not exclusive to India. Farmer suicides are on the rise even in developed countries like France and America, where major multinational companies have captured a monopoly and exploited the farmers.

7. The farmers' main demands include a rollback of the three ordinances, maintaining the APMC system, clearing their loans, and a law to ensure MSP is at least 50% more than the weighted average cost of production.