The text appears to be a critique of a film, likely a comedy or action film, featuring a character named Alexander Nevsky. The narrator discusses the film's various plot points, characters, and scenes, often in a sarcastic or mocking tone.
The film seems to be a mix of historical, action, and comedy elements, with a plot involving a professor of history, a race, and a treasure hunt. The narrator criticizes the film's script, character development, and plot inconsistencies, and makes several jokes and references throughout.
The film's main character, Alexander Nevsky, is described as a bad actor and a poor choice for the lead role. The narrator also mentions the film's use of vodka as a plot device and criticizes the film's portrayal of the Templar order and its relics.
The narrator also discusses the film's budget and production, noting that it cost 10 million dollars. The film's climax involves a chase scene and a shootout, which the narrator criticizes for being unrealistic and poorly executed.
Throughout the critique, the narrator frequently uses humor and sarcasm to express their disdain for the film. The critique concludes with a comment about the film's potential to be a "bad film" and a critique of the film's advertising for vodka.
1. Alexander Kuritsyn, a famous producer, played the main role in a film released in 2007. The film was set in 16th century Russia and featured the Templar order.
2. The film was produced by Tsar Pictures and the Parliament of the World Group.
3. The film's storyline involved a professor of history who was looking for the treasures of the Templars.
4. The film featured a scene where a drug deal was interrupted by the police, leading to a chase and a shootout.
5. The film's plot involved a race where the winner was Alexander Nevsky, a character who was portrayed as a bad actor.
6. The film's plot also involved a kidnapping of Nevsky's sister by the bandits, leading to a hostage situation.
7. The film's plot concluded with a chase scene involving a rocket launcher and a sniper rifle.
8. The film's plot also involved a scene where the amulet was mined, leading to a senseless chase of the city.
9. The film's plot concluded with a scene where the amulet was attached to a fire of a gospel that did not burn and did not drown, leading to the discovery of the treasure in the Arabian desert.
10. The film was criticized for its poor script and acting, with the producer and director of the film being mentioned.