The summary of the conversation revolves around the escalating tension between India and certain countries, particularly Canada and the UK, due to the activities of Khalistani terrorists. The narrative highlights a series of incidents where Indian diplomats, including the High Commissioner Swami, were targeted and intimidated in these countries.
In London, the High Commissioner was prevented from entering a gurudwara (a Sikh temple) to participate in cultural activities. When he arrived at the gurudwara, a group of people, suspected to be Khalistani terrorists, attempted to disrupt the event and intimidate the High Commissioner. The British authorities were alert and put up security measures, including a barricade around the Indian High Commission building.
In Canada, there were similar incidents where Indian diplomats were threatened and intimidated by Khalistani terrorists. The Indian government has raised these issues with the authorities in these countries, but the response has been mixed. While the UK authorities have given assurances, the Canadian authorities, due to domestic political reasons, have been reluctant to act against these terrorists.
The narrative also mentions that the Indian High Commissioner's name was put up on a social media poster, blaming him for the killing of Hardeep Singh, an Indian citizen, in Canada. This is part of a larger conspiracy theory being propagated on social media, accusing Indian diplomats of being part of a larger network involved in extrajudicial activities against solicitors.
The narrative concludes by emphasizing the need for these countries to take action against Khalistani terrorists, as the issue is not just about freedom but also about the bilateral relationship between India and these countries. The Indian government is not willing to lie down and accept the blame for these incidents, and it is up to the authorities in these countries to keep these violent agents under check.
1. The relationship between the Kennedy side and the Indian agencies is under strain due to the Palestinian issue.
2. The Indian agencies are suspected of being involved in the killing of Aditya, a major traded calisthenic terrorist.
3. Canada views Aditya as a political activist.
4. Palestine terrorism has opened a new front in London.
5. When Indian High Commissioner Swami was stopped from entering a gurudwara in Glasgow, he was there to participate in several cultural activities.
6. The Indian High Commissioner was invited to the gurudwara in Glasgow to take part in a longer engagement.
7. Two or three people from the first group got to know that the Indian High Commissioner was reaching there and rushed to disrupt the event.
8. The High Commissioner was asked to stop and go back when he was about to open the door for the High Commissioner.
9. India raised issue with the British authorities and the foreign office of UK about the incident.
10. Another khalisari protest planned in front of the Indian High Commissioner in London was prevented by British officials.
11. A barricade was put on the outer perimeter of the Indian High Commissioner's commercial building in London.
12. The issue of Palestinian terrorism has been a vocal and threatening issue in four countries: Canada, UK, Western Australia.
13. India has raised the issue with all these countries.
14. Canadian authorities, for domestic political reasons, were reluctant in acting against these terrorists.
15. Some assurances have been given by the Australian government, the U.S, and London authorities to the Indian government.
16. There has been some sort of security extended to the Indian development and Indian communities.
17. Despite all these, there is a rise in a threat on social media.
18. The Indian High Commissioner's name was put on a social media poster and he was blamed for the killing of Hardeep Singh.
19. The Indian High Commissioner became the Swami's name and he was also blamed for the killing of Hardeep Singh.
20. The issue is not very freedom with Canada in the background.
21. UK authorities also need to keep a check on these khalistani violent agents.
22. The bilateral relationship will clearly have a repercussion as we have seen a huge diplomatic case of that is already going on between India and Canada.
23. The Indian government is not taking the entire blame game or diplomatic game lying down.
24. If these countries or these elements in those countries are not kept under check by the authorities or the administration in those countries, it could lead to a diplomatic case.