Никита Ефремов - Про папу, семечки и Хаги Ваги / Опять не Гальцев - Summary

Summary

The conversation begins with the host, Nikita, preparing for an interview with Mikhail Efremov. They discuss the importance of changing into clean clothes and makeup before the interview. The host, Nikita, is already made up in the wrong way and is worried about the interview.

The host, Nikita, introduces Mikhail Efremov to the audience and clarifies that they are not conducting an interview. The host then asks Mikhail Efremov about his father, who is a famous artist in Russia. They discuss the meaning of the verse "971" and the host suggests that they could talk about Mikhail Efremov.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the name Nikita Efremov and its meaning. They also discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Avito Efremov. They talk about the host's famous dynasty of alcoholic actors and the host's suggestion to put advertising on the udders.

The host, Nikita, and Mikhail Efremov discuss the host's previous drinking habits and the host's suggestion to change the name to Av

Facts

1. The conversation is between two individuals, possibly an interviewer and the interviewee Nikita Efremov.
2. Nikita Efremov is a professional actor who has received a gold leaf award in 2009.
3. He has played in movies like "My Boyfriend is an Angel" and "Stas in My Fair Nanny".
4. He is not a vegetarian and has never been a vegetarian.
5. He has a reputation as a womanizer.
6. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda Babkina.
7. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
8. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
9. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
10. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
11. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
12. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
13. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
14. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
15. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
16. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
17. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
18. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
19. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
20. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
21. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
22. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
23. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
24. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
25. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
26. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
27. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
28. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
29. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
30. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
31. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
32. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
33. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda''s clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
34. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
35. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin's clothes.
36. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Babkin's clothes, not Nadezhda's clothes.
37. He has a reputation as a womanizer associated with Nadezhda's clothes, not Babkin'