The text discusses a recent election law trial involving Representative Lee Jae-myung. It highlights the controversy surrounding his claims of not knowing Mr. Kim Moon-ki and his defense based on the concept of personal closeness. The text also mentions a delay in the trial process, deviating from the legal requirement of a swift resolution. The author raises concerns about the inconsistency in the application of the law and calls for institutional improvements to address these issues.
1. Representative Lee Jae-myung announced false facts about the election law trial, claiming it occurred last Friday.
2. The election law trial was the 11th trial originally scheduled for last Friday, starting at 10:30 a.m.
3. Due to Lee Jae-myung's attendance at the Fukushima Contamination Water Rally, the trial started 4 hours later at 2:30 p.m.
4. Representative Lee Jae-myung claimed not to know Mr. Kim Moon-ki, stating he was not one of the 600 team leaders but a pledge.
5. Lee Jae-myung mentioned a facial recognition problem as a defense in the trial.
6. The lawmaker, 2nd Ki-in, appeared as a witness, challenging Lee Jae-myung's claims.
7. There is a discrepancy in adhering to the "633 principle" in Representative Lee Jae-myung's election law trial, violating the required timeline for verdicts.
8. The delay in the trial raises questions about the fairness and neutrality of the legal process.
9. The Supreme Court's failure to follow the "633 principle" has implications for Representative Lee Jae-myung's eligibility and political figures' trial durations.