The video is a speech by Maria Pevchikh, who discusses the impact of an investigation about Putin's palace that she and others conducted. The investigation gained significant attention, with 110 million views, making it a major disruption to state propaganda. The video highlights the Kremlin's attempts to counter the investigation, such as staging a visit to the palace and appointing another person as the owner. The Kremlin's attempts to justify Putin's lifestyle and deny the investigation's findings are criticized as unconvincing and absurd. The video concludes with a call to action to resist censorship and spread the truth about Putin's palace. [Source: Video Transcript]
1. Maria Pevchikh, a video creator, recorded a video to celebrate their achievement of breaking the state propaganda system in Russia [Source: User's Input].
2. The video about Putin's palace has garnered 110 million views, with almost every fourth Russian watching it [Source: User's Input].
3. The video was so popular that it had a viewership rate of almost 70%, and was seen by 60% of Russians according to polls [Source: User's Input].
4. The film's popularity was so high that it influenced the Kremlin's strategy, leading to a change in their communication tactics [Source: User's Input].
5. The film's investigation led to the revelation that Putin's palace was not as luxurious as previously thought, and was more of an apart-hotel [Source: User's Input].
6. The film's investigation also exposed the Kremlin's attempts to justify the construction of the palace, which was described as an attempt to build an apart-hotel [Source: User's Input].
7. The film's investigation also revealed that the state company Transneft, headed by Putin's colleague in Dresden, was paying 120 million a month for renting the unfinished apart-hotel of Rotenberg [Source: User's Input].
8. The film's investigation also exposed the Kremlin's attempts to justify the high costs of the palace, arguing that the apart-hotel would be similar to a luxury hotel in Sochi [Source: User's Input].
9. The film's investigation also revealed that the apart-hotel was being built with financial assistance from the state company Transneft, which was headed by Putin's colleague in Dresden [Source: User's Input].
10. The film's investigation also exposed the Kremlin's attempts to justify the high costs of the palace, arguing that the apart-hotel would be similar to a luxury hotel in Sochi [Source: User's Input].
11. The film's investigation also revealed that the state company Transneft, headed by Putin's colleague in Dresden, was paying 120 million a month for renting the unfinished apart-hotel of Rotenberg [Source: User's Input].
12. The film's investigation also exposed the Kremlin's attempts to justify the high costs of the palace, arguing that the apart-hotel would be similar to a luxury hotel in Sochi [Source: User's Input].
13. The film's investigation also revealed that the state company Transneft, headed by Putin's colleague in Dresden, was paying 120 million a month for renting the unfinished apart-hotel of Rotenberg [Source: User's Input].
14. The film's investigation also exposed the Kremlin's attempts to justify the high costs of the palace, arguing that the apart-hotel would be similar to a luxury hotel in Sochi [Source: User's Input].