The video is a humorous and lighthearted exploration of Japanese sweets by two hosts, Gris and Charly. They express their excitement for the video and appreciate the viewers' suggestions. They ordered various Japanese sweets, which took about two months to arrive.
They begin by sharing their initial impressions and reactions, including one sweet that they describe as having a "rotten fish" smell. They also comment on the difficulty of pronouncing the names of some sweets.
The hosts then proceed to taste test the sweets, describing their flavors and textures. Despite some initial hesitation, they seem to enjoy the experience overall. They discuss the cultural significance of sweets in Japan and the potential health benefits of consuming them.
Throughout the video, the hosts maintain a friendly and engaging tone, frequently addressing the viewers and joking about their reactions to the sweets. They also discuss the potential health benefits of consuming these sweets and make comparisons to other foods and beverages.
In conclusion, the video is a fun and informative exploration of Japanese sweets, providing viewers with a unique perspective on this culinary tradition.
1. The video is a new video of Gris and Charly, who are known for their challenges.
2. The video is designed to entertain viewers and engage with them through comments and challenges.
3. The viewers have been asked to suggest Japanese sweets for the hosts to try.
4. The hosts have ordered the suggested sweets, which took about two months to arrive.
5. The first sweet tried was a challenge for the hosts as they were not used to the taste.
6. The sweet was compared to spies and squid in Chilecito, a popular sweet among young people and adults.
7. The hosts found the smell of the sweets very strong and unpleasant.
8. The hosts compared the smell to the worst smelling candy they had ever encountered.
9. One of the sweets tried was a popsicle that tasted like soda.
10. The hosts found the texture of the sweets strange, with some resembling chocolate crayons.
11. One of the sweets was described as creamy chocolate.
12. The hosts found the taste of the sweets rich and strange, with some tasting like medicine.
13. The hosts expressed that they would prefer cheaper chocolate over the expensive sweets they tried.
14. The hosts tried a popsicle with powder on it, which was a bet.
15. The hosts expressed their desire to see how much they could eat of the sweets.
16. The hosts compared the smell of the sweets to dog food and found it strange.
17. The hosts found the smell of the sweets to be very strange and compared it to the smell of the Japanese who come to make sweets.
18. The hosts found the consistency of the sweets to be watery and disgusting, especially those made of rice.
19. The hosts tried a kitkat type sweet, which they imagined to be as it is.
20. The hosts found the sweet rich in texture but used a lot of rice.
21. The hosts tried sweets in the shape of kittens, which were made of chocolate and milk.
22. The hosts found some of the sweets to taste like medicine or left a taste that was not familiar to them.
23. The hosts tried a soda with Acura soft drinks color and flavor, which they compared to Pepsi.
24. The hosts expressed that they would prefer cheaper chocolate over the expensive sweets they tried.
25. The hosts tried a sweet that looked like a cell phone from Japan, which they found to be very bad.
26. The hosts found the taste of the sweets to be very strange and compared it to cinnamon and fried chocolate.
27. The hosts found the smell of the sweets to be horrible and compared it to rotten fish and an octopus squid.
28. The hosts expressed their desire for viewers to like the video and not forget to do so.
29. The hosts expressed their hope that viewers would enjoy the video and look forward to the next one.