During the impeachment trial of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, prosecutor Brandon Trock Banger is questioned about the complaint made against Paxton's alleged misuse of power. Banger is grilled on whether the complaint was lacking sufficient, specific allegations of Paxton's violation of state law, and whether he and his team went behind Paxton's back to file the complaint with the FBI. Banger is also questioned about terminating attorney Brandon Cammack's employment without compensation and attention to detail when sending out a letter without Paxton's name on it.
Sure, here are the key facts extracted from the provided text:
1. The initial complaint was discussed and deemed insufficient because it lacked specific allegations.
2. The complainants were considering going to the FBI.
3. The question was asked whether they informed Ken Paxton about going to the FBI.
4. There was a need to "beef up" the specific allegations in the complaint.
5. Brandon Kamik's termination was discussed, and it was mentioned that he was not appointed as an attorney Pro Tem.
6. The Travis County District Attorney's Office did not formally recuse themselves from the complaints.
7. The termination letter sent to Brandon Kamik did not have Ken Paxton's name on the letterhead.
8. The letter requested Kamik to cease and desist his activities.
These facts provide an overview of the discussion in the text without including opinions or interpretations.