Cho Jeong-hoon, CEO of Changing Times, was interviewed about a variety of political topics. He discussed the controversy surrounding Rep. Kim Nam-guk's return to work after 17 days, expressing frustration about the lack of accountability from politicians. He called for a deeper understanding of public anger and a more severe disciplinary action for politicians who make mistakes.
Cho also commented on the internal strife within the Democratic Party, criticizing the party's defenders of Rep. Kim Nam-guk and calling for an end to "gang politics" and "demagogic politics". He emphasized the importance of dignity and a sense of responsibility in politics, comparing Rep. Kim Nam-guk unfavorably with Rep. Kim Hae-young.
Cho discussed his role in the upcoming general election, suggesting that the anti-dictatorship movement should end its effective period in the next era. He expressed disappointment with the behavior of ruling and opposition parties, particularly regarding bills related to people's livelihood.
Regarding the Fukushima nuclear power plant water discharge, Cho expressed concern about the public's worries and called for a depoliticized, scientific approach to the issue. He also criticized the National Election Commission, accusing it of malpractice and a lack of accountability. He called for punishment for the hiring corruption scandal at the commission, criticizing the "moral double standard" of politicians.
1. The interview was with Cho Jeong-hoon, CEO of Changing Times.
2. The discussion was centered around Rep. Kim Nam-guk, who had returned after 17 days.
3. The CEO expressed disappointment that returning to work became news.
4. The CEO questioned the absurdity of the first speech of the long-awaited congressman.
5. The CEO criticized the people's anger and suggested that politicians should admit their wrongs and bow their heads.
6. When asked if Representative Kim Nam-guk would voluntarily resign, he did not give any answer.
7. The Special Ethics Committee would proceed with the disciplinary process quickly, potentially involving expulsion or public apology.
8. The CEO expressed hope for Representative Kim Nam-guk's happiness and suggested that a disciplinary action should be imposed that reflects the people's anger.
9. The CEO was asked about voices calling for voluntary resignations within the Democratic Party, to which he did not provide a direct answer.
10. The CEO criticized internal strife within the Democratic Party, partly due to the situation involving Rep. Kim Nam-guk and suspicion of money envelopes.
11. The CEO warned against gang politics and demagogic politics, stating that these prevent Korean politics from moving forward.
12. The CEO discussed his meeting with Kim Hae-young, a former Supreme Council member, Democratic Party, and compared their attitudes towards dignity and sense of responsibility.
13. The CEO mentioned that the period of validity of the so-called May 86 anti-dictatorship forces had ended and this should be addressed in the upcoming general election.
14. The CEO discussed his plans for the general election and the role he would play, hinting at the possibility of creating a new party.
15. The CEO criticized the outdatedness of politicians' thoughts and behavior patterns, suggesting that political strife is the essence of politics.
16. The CEO expressed hope that no party will win more than 150 seats in the next general election, advocating for compromise and cooperation.
17. The CEO discussed his opposition to the Nursing Act, arguing that it contained unconstitutional provisions and was opposed by all health care organizations.
18. The CEO questioned the division of opinions between the ruling and opposition parties on the discharge of water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
19. The CEO discussed his protest at the Japanese embassy and his concerns about Fukushima contaminated water.
20. The CEO criticized the National Election Commission, suggesting that it has rotted a lot and has benefited from the incompetence of the political world.
21. The CEO criticized the National Election Commission for its suspected preferential hiring of children and questioned the lack of leaders in society who make an effort to correct their mistakes.