The text appears to be a transcript of a conversation or hearing, likely in a legal or investigative context. It discusses a case involving the death of a Marine and the subsequent investigation.
The speaker expresses resentment towards the pressure they feel they are under, particularly from a legal administrator who asked them to drop the crime, remove the facts of the charge, and remove the suspect. They feel this pressure is external and feels like it could be damaging to their image if it were to be leaked to the public.
The speaker discusses their interactions with the Ministry of National Defense and the Marine Corps, where they were instructed to control in advance to avoid going into deep water. They also mention a meeting held by the Ministry of National Defense to deal with the external pressure they were experiencing.
The speaker also talks about their refusal to comply with certain orders, such as not sending an investigation report or transferring the case to the police. They express their belief in the fairness of the investigation and trial process and their belief in the rule of law.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the prosecution team of the Ministry of National Defense, expressing their concerns about the team's handling of the investigation documents. They express their desire for a fair and transparent investigation by the President.
The speaker also discusses the potential charges against high-ranking officials, expressing their belief that such charges could be seen as excessive. They also discuss their interactions with the legal affairs officer of the Ministry of National Defense, expressing their belief that the officer was pressuring them to remove the division commander from the investigation.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the Marine Corps, expressing their belief that the Corps and its officers are treating them unfairly. They express their belief that the Marine Corps should treat its soldiers like their own comrades, not like tools.
The speaker also talks about their interactions with the judicial officer's office, expressing their belief that the office was pressuring them to limit the people who were directly at fault for the incident. They also express their belief that the judicial officer's office was pressuring them to remove the division commander from the investigation.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the Vice Minister, expressing their belief that the Vice Minister provided the information about the cell phone. They also discuss their interactions with the commander of the Marine Corps, expressing their belief that the commander has two cell phones.
The speaker also discusses the legal implications of their case, expressing their belief that the Military Court Act has been revised to remove the military's investigative authority. They also discuss their interactions with the court, expressing their belief that the court has jurisdiction over the case.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the prosecution team of the Ministry of National Defense, expressing their belief that the team is discussing violation of the Military Secrets Protection Act and is talking about abuse of power. They also discuss their interactions with the Minister of National Defense, expressing their belief that the Minister is exerting considerable pressure on them.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the Marine Corps investigation team, expressing their belief that the team is pressuring them to transfer the case. They also discuss their interactions with the Gyeongbuk Provincial Police Agency, expressing their belief that the Agency has stolen their transfer memorandum.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the prosecution team of the Ministry of National Defense, expressing their belief that the team is discussing violation of the Military Secrets Protection Act and is talking about abuse of power. They also discuss their interactions with the Minister of National Defense, expressing their belief that the Minister is exerting considerable pressure on them.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the Marine Corps investigation team, expressing their belief that the team is pressuring them to transfer the case. They also discuss their interactions with the Gyeongbuk Provincial Police Agency, expressing their belief that the Agency has stolen their transfer memorandum.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the prosecution team of the Ministry of National Defense, expressing their belief that the team is discussing violation of the Military Secrets Protection Act and is talking about abuse of power. They also discuss their interactions with the Minister of National Defense, expressing their belief that the Minister is exerting considerable pressure on them.
The speaker also discusses their interactions with the Marine Corps investigation team, expressing their belief that the team is pressuring them to transfer the case. They also discuss their interactions with the Gyeongbuk Provincial Police Agency, expressing their belief that the Agency has stolen their
1. The speaker expresses resentment towards Jung-gyeong, a friend, due to his appearance at the prosecution today.
2. The speaker is asked about the details of the investigation, particularly the key reason why they felt the charges were external pressure rather than simply conveying their opinion.
3. The speaker recounts a series of phone calls with an administrator, who repeatedly asked them to drop the crime, remove the facts of the charge, and remove the suspect.
4. The speaker clarifies that the administrator's current statements feel like external pressure.
5. The speaker questions what a third party would think if they heard this conversation.
6. The speaker discusses a meeting from the Ministry of National Defense on external pressure, where they were present.
7. The speaker expresses concern about the image of the Marine Corps being damaged due to the handling of the investigation.
8. The speaker discusses the transfer of the case to the police, stating that it was their own idea and that it was the only way for the Marine Corps to remain an honest organization.
9. The speaker recounts a conversation with the Ministry of National Defense manager, who suggested limiting the people who were directly at fault for the incident.
10. The speaker expresses their opinion that it would be appropriate to transfer the division commander in such a way so that the police can make a reasonable judgment and investigation.
11. The speaker discusses a phone conversation with the legal affairs officer, who provided information about the cell phone.
12. The speaker questions why the Marine Corps is not listening to their statements and expresses their intention to consult with their lawyer about the matter.
13. The speaker discusses the procedures for crimes committed by military personnel with judicial jurisdiction, stating that the military has no investigative authority.
14. The speaker discusses the violation of the President's order and the prosecution team's discussion of violation of the Military Secrets Protection Act and abuse of power.
15. The speaker expresses their intention to take legal action against the military prosecutors or the Ministry of Defense legal affairs officers near the Minister of National Defense.
16. The speaker discusses the theft of a transfer memorandum by an employee of the Gyeongbuk Provincial Police Agency, stating that the document is now invalid.
17. The speaker discusses the possibility of applying the same crime that was applied to Warrant Officer Yeram, stating that the person who exerted the pressure was the subject.
18. The speaker discusses the importance of a fair investigation and trial, stating that even if a person is the Minister of National Defense, they cannot break the law.
19. The speaker states that they are planning to hold a moment of silence towards the president to seek an appropriate solution to the problem.
20. The speaker discusses the measures that could be taken against their person if they refuse to conduct an investigation.
21. The speaker questions the right way to proceed in this situation, stating that there are bigger concerns than their own interests.
22. The speaker discusses the potential constitutional impeachment of the person who interfered with the investigation and stole the investigation documents.
23. The speaker discusses the possibility of the case being handled by a public investigation office and the need for a fair investigation.
24. The speaker expresses their belief in the power of the state and the people's sense of justice, stating that they will resist external pressure on the investigation.
25. The speaker discusses the possibility of impeachment by the National Assembly and the role of the commander-in-chief of the military in solving the problem.
26. The speaker discusses the possibility of legal action being taken against them, stating that it can be taken.
27. The speaker questions the right way to proceed, stating that there are bigger concerns than their own interests.
28. The speaker discusses the potential for a constitutional impeachment, stating that this kind of action is a constitutional impeachment.
29. The speaker discusses the need for a fair investigation and trial, stating that even if a person is the Minister of National Defense, they cannot break the law.
30. The speaker states that they are planning to hold a moment of silence towards the president to seek an appropriate solution to the problem.
31. The speaker discusses the measures that could be taken against their person if they refuse to conduct an investigation.
32. The speaker expresses their belief in the power of the state and the people's sense of justice, stating that they will resist external pressure on the investigation.
33. The speaker discusses the possibility of impeachment