The discussion revolves around the recent decision by the Constitutional Court on the Swordsman's Park Act, a political party lines case. The panelists express their views on the case and its implications, including the criticism of the Democratic Party's handling of the situation.
The Constitutional Court has made a decision on two cases related to the Swordsman's Park Act, a political party lines case. The panelists discuss the procedural issues that arose during the National Assembly discussion. They argue that while there were procedural issues, they were not enough to invalidate the law. The panelists stress the importance of following the procedures stipulated in the National Assembly Act when passing a bill.
The panelists also discuss the role of the Chairman of the Legislative and Judiciary Committee, who they believe violated the law. They argue that the Democratic Party should apologize for this violation. The panelists criticize the Democratic Party for pushing ahead without any consultation process based on their numerical superiority. They argue that this could be a violation of the National Assembly's long-standing practice and the National Assembly Act.
The panelists also discuss the Constitutional Court's decision on the prosecution's investigative and indicting rights. They argue that the prosecution's right to investigate and the right to prosecute are the powers granted by the Constitution. They criticize the Constitutional Court for confirming the Democratic Party's claim that the prosecution's collective opposition to the passed bills was motivated by organizational interests.
The panelists also comment on the controversy surrounding Representative Lee Jae-myung, who was indicted without detention. They criticize the Democratic Party for the expedient behavior in obtaining a copy of the party representative from prostitutes to minimize the risk.
In conclusion, the panelists express their views on the political controversy, the decision by the Constitutional Court, and the role of the Democratic Party in the situation. They call for a balanced approach in dealing with the situation and criticize the Democratic Party for its handling of the situation.
1. The discussion is centered around the political party lines of the Swordsman's Park Act, with two cases filed by the Constitutional Court.
2. The National Assembly faced procedural issues during the discussion, but it does not invalidate the law.
3. The Constitutional Court has cited the act of violating the law, and the Democratic Party should naturally apologize and reflect.
4. The National Assembly is mediating through dialogue and compromise, pushing ahead without any consultation process based on their numerical superiority.
5. The Constitutional Court's decision has been interpreted as a violation of the National Assembly's long-standing practice and the National Assembly Act.
6. The prosecution's right to investigate and the right to prosecute are the powers granted by the Constitution.
7. The Constitutional Court has confirmed that the prosecution's collective opposition to the passed bills was motivated by organizational interests.
8. The prosecutors' right to investigate and indict is not a power guaranteed by the Constitution.
9. The Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, is the highest judicial decision in the country.
10. Representative Lee Jae-myung is now indicted without detention, and the ruling by the Democratic Party's Party Affairs Committee to save Lee Jae-myung is likely to have violated the severance of party members in a very expedient manner.
11. The prosecution knows it by looking at the momentum of the investigation to the extent of saying this.
12. The current investigation regarding Representative Lee Jae-myeong is a political investigation.
13. Rep. Christian Christian has claimed that he received 100 million won from Optimus and that he received 3 million won in a suit worth 5 million won. He was indicted.
14. The Democratic Party is promoting that bill for the benefit of farmers, stabilizing the price of rice, and other such grandiose reasons.
15. In the case of amendments to the Bilateral Management Act, if both parties spend some time discussing it, a compromise can be reached.