The narrator of the transcript is a woman who is trying to identify the killer among five suspects. Her husband was murdered, and each of the suspects received an envelope from him that said their Netflix show. One of the envelopes said "killer." The narrator has security footage and video evidence to help her identify the killer.
The narrator uses a series of challenges inspired by popular Netflix shows like "Squid Game" and "Stranger Things" to help her deduce who the killer might be. These challenges include a "Squid Game Challenge," where the suspects must recreate specific actions from the show to gain immunity, and a "Stranger Things Challenge," where they must identify objects without looking at them.
Throughout these challenges, the narrator observes the suspects' behavior and makes deductions based on their actions. For example, she notices that one of the suspects, Poppy, hates peanut butter, which matches the killer's dislike for peanut butter according to the narrator's observations.
In the final challenge, the narrator uses a game of "Impossible Shapes" inspired by "The Flash" to test the suspects' agility and reflexes. The suspects who successfully complete the challenge are considered potential candidates for the killer.
After the final challenge, the narrator makes her final guess, pointing out that the suspect who successfully completed the impossible shapes challenge and who hated peanut butter is likely the killer. However, the suspect opens their envelope and reveals that they are not the killer. The narrator is left to make another guess, and the transcript ends with her realizing that the person who pet Blackjack, a dangerous dog, could be the killer.
1. The narrator's husband, Matt, has been murdered.
2. The narrator has five suspects for Matt's murder.
3. Each suspect was given an envelope by Matt, which said their Netflix show but one of them said killer.
4. The narrator has security footage and video evidence to help identify the killer.
5. The narrator uses the Netflix show "Squid Game Challenge" as a way to identify if the suspects are right-handed, like the killer.
6. The narrator identifies one suspect as possibly the killer based on their behavior in the challenge.
7. The narrator identifies a second suspect as possibly the killer based on their behavior in the challenge.
8. The narrator identifies a third suspect as possibly the killer based on their behavior in the challenge.
9. The narrator identifies a fourth suspect as possibly the killer based on their behavior in the challenge.
10. The narrator identifies a fifth suspect as possibly the killer based on their behavior in the challenge.
11. The narrator has made five guesses about the killer's identity, and has narrowed it down to one suspect.
12. The final suspect denies being the killer, but the narrator guesses they are, based on their behavior in the challenge.
13. The suspect who denied being the killer is eliminated from the challenge.
14. The final suspect is identified as the killer by the narrator.
15. The narrator reveals that the killer had a tattoo on their right wrist, which matches the narrator's evidence.
16. The narrator uses a "Never Off I Ever" challenge to identify the killer, asking the suspects questions and requiring them to remove a layer of clothing if they answer incorrectly.
17. The narrator identifies the killer as the suspect who answered incorrectly to the question "Never have I ever kissed two different people in 24 hours."
18. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
19. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
20. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
21. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
22. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
23. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
24. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
25. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
26. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
27. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
28. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
29. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
30. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
31. The killer is revealed to be the suspect who had not kissed two different people in 24 hours, and had not removed a layer of clothing as a consequence.
32. The killer is revealed to be the suspect