1 МЛН ОРБИЗОВ vs СЕЙФ в БАССЕЙНЕ! - Summary

Summary

The video is an experiment conducted by two individuals, presumably Ruslan and Max, to test the strength and durability of a safe. They discuss the safety and trustworthiness of safes, and how they are often used to store valuable items. The experiment involves various methods to test the safe's resilience, including:

1. Lowering the safe into liquid nitrogen and dropping it from heights.
2. Inflating the inside of the safe with a vest.
3. Erasing a safe on asphalt by leading it on a leash.
4. Destroying the safe with a million orbs and putting it in water.

The orbs, when placed in water, increase in size and cause damage to the safe. The experiment is conducted in a controlled environment, and the results are recorded and discussed. The safe is also tested with a vest designed to explode on contact with water. The safe is dropped from a height into liquid nitrogen to test its impact resistance. The safe is also rubbed on asphalt and shaken violently for an extended period to test its durability. In the end, the safe is dropped from a height of about 10 meters into liquid nitrogen, causing it to shatter like glass. The experiment concludes with the safe being destroyed, proving its vulnerability to various methods of attack.

Facts

1. The text describes an experiment involving safes and different tests to assess their strength and durability. [Source: Text]
2. The experimenters prepared three safes for testing. [Source: Text]
3. One of the tests involved lowering the safe with liquid nitrogen and observing its effects. [Source: Text]
4. Another test involved inflating the inside of the safe with a specific vest. [Source: Text]
5. The experimenters were also considering the possibility of destroying the safe by leading it on a leash or putting it in water. [Source: Text]
6. The experimenters conducted the experiment in Thailand and took six months to prepare for it. [Source: Text]
7. They used a small ball that absorbs water and increases in size when submerged. [Source: Text]
8. They hypothesized that placing this small ball into a smaller container would cause it to increase in size and potentially break the walls of the safes. [Source: Text]
9. They were able to observe the growth of the ball inside the safe and noted that it increased as much as there was water there. [Source: Text]
10. They made a hole in a jar and immersed it in a large amount of water, causing the ball to increase in size without limit. [Source: Text]
11. They concluded that the ball could potentially push and deform objects, and used this principle to test the safes. [Source: Text]
12. After 24 hours, they found cracks in the corners of the safes, indicating that the balls had caused damage. [Source: Text]
13. However, the balls were too small to completely break the safes. [Source: Text]
14. The experimenters also tried to destroy the safes with a drop-down vest filled with gas. [Source: Text]
15. The vest had a gas cylinder and a sensor triggered by contact with water. [Source: Text]
16. They observed that the safe was deformed but not destroyed when hit with the vest. [Source: Text]
17. They also tried to rub the safe off on the asphalt, causing visible deformations. [Source: Text]
18. They concluded that while they could not completely destroy the safes, they could cause significant damage. [Source: Text]
19. The experimenters also conducted a test with liquid nitrogen at a height of about 10 meters. [Source: Text]
20. They observed that the safe shattered upon impact with the frozen nitrogen. [Source: Text]
21. In conclusion, the experimenters were able to cause significant damage to the safes using various methods, but were unable to completely destroy them. [Source: Text]