The text appears to be a transcript of a news report or a discussion about the dismissal of an arrest warrant against Representative Lee Jae-myeong. The report discusses the reasons for the dismissal, the length of the warrant review process, and the implications of the decision.
The warrant review process took a significant amount of time, with the court deliberating for over 6 hours and the warrant review lasting a total of 9 hours and 20 minutes. The court announced its decision to dismiss the warrant around 2:20 am.
The dismissal was based on a review of the charges against Lee Jae-myeong. The court found that the charges were unusually long, with a total of 892 characters. It was suggested that the court's decision to dismiss the warrant was due to a lack of concern about the destruction of evidence.
The dismissal of the warrant has been met with mixed reactions. Some supporters of Lee Jae-myeong are excited about his behavior, viewing it as a show of courtesy. However, others argue that there is still room for dispute over the charges, suggesting that further investigation is required.
The report concludes by stating that the dismissal decision is not a final legal judgment and that the situation within the Democratic Party is under scrutiny. The future of the case and the potential for future legal actions are still uncertain.
1. The composition value will be reviewed.
2. The charge is that the evidence was investigated.
3. The final burden is at hand.
4. Representative Lee Jae-myeong of the Democratic Party was at a crossroads.
5. The arrest warrant was eventually dismissed.
6. Representative Lee Jae-myeong returned to Green Hospital and is focusing on recovery.
7. The warrant review took a total of 9 hours and 20 minutes, excluding break time.
8. The court announced its decision to dismiss after deliberating for over 6 hours.
9. Representative Lee Jae-myeong left the Seoul Detention Center around 4 am, first in a wheelchair.
10. Chief Judge Yoo Chang-hoon explained the reasons for dismissal.
11. The decision was unusually long, with a total of 892 characters.
12. The decision only deals with the judgment on whether or not to be detained.
13. The decisive reason why the arrest warrant was dismissed is not clear.
14. CEO Lee Jae-myeong went for a review two days after breaking his fast.
15. The warrant review process is a decision that is very in line with the TPO at the actual review stage of the warrant.
16. The decision to dismiss the warrant was based on the premise that the case is proven.
17. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are a third-party bribery charge related to bribery.
18. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are somewhat questionable.
19. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are expected to be clarified differently.
20. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to remittances to North Korea.
21. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the charge of instigation of perjury.
22. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to Lee Ga-eun's destruction of evidence.
23. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the decision to set a track for the trial.
24. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the decision to arrest Roy.
25. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the expectation that the conclusion may change depending on how much of the charges are clarified through the intense trial process.
26. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the possibility of the prosecution requesting zero points in the future.
27. The charges against CEO Lee Jun-seok are related to the possibility of just indicting him without a warrant depending on the degree of proof.
28. Representative Lee Jae-myeong greeted the prison guards as he was leaving the Seoul Detention Center.