The speaker discusses their experiences using a book called GPT and questions whether coding is necessary. They acknowledge GPT's efficiency but believe that it cannot replace developers. They emphasize the importance of understanding the bigger picture and potential future business needs as a developer, as well as the need for ongoing education and training to advance. The speaker encourages using Google for studying and sharing experiences with others in the comment section. They end by promising better content in the future.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The author has been using a book or tool called "gpt" for coding assistance.
2. The "gpt" tool can answer questions, find errors, and provide code within 10 to 30 seconds.
3. The author is questioning the need for manual coding given the effectiveness of the "gpt" tool.
4. The author wonders if their company would still need to pay for labor costs if "gpt" can replace them.
5. The author suggests that a "chat pt" (possibly referring to another tool) could be a cheaper replacement.
6. There is a belief that developers will still be needed despite these tools' capabilities.
7. The author discusses the importance of developers understanding the entire context and future scenarios for coding.
8. The demand for senior-level developers is expected to increase due to the complexity of IT services.
9. The text emphasizes the need to train and discover new developers rather than relying solely on existing ones.
10. There is a discussion about the importance of optimizing code and not relying solely on tools like "gpt."
11. The author advises studying and using Google to gain insights into coding.
12. There is a mention that tools like "gpt" might eventually provide perfect answers, making Google less necessary.
13. The author invites readers to share their opinions and experiences with "Whip Fit" in the comments.
These facts summarize the main points of the text without including opinions.