A YouTuber has received a community guideline strike with no explanation other than the violation of child safety, but the video in question is from 2019 and has been on the platform for years. The YouTuber is frustrated with the lack of communication and respect from YouTube and believes that there should be better communication with creators, especially if they are in good standing and have been contributing to the platform for a long time. The YouTuber believes that YouTube needs to take care of the creators who make the platform successful instead of just seeing them as a number.
Sure, here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The author received a community guideline strike on YouTube for a video titled "Try Not to Laugh Number Eight."
2. The strike was given for violating child safety guidelines, but the author was not provided with specific details about the violation.
3. The author expressed frustration about the lack of communication and transparency from YouTube regarding the strike.
4. They mentioned their channel's longevity and their dedication to YouTube as a content creator.
5. The author criticized YouTube for not reaching out to creators for communication before issuing strikes.
6. They questioned YouTube's approach to handling violations and suggested a more collaborative approach.
7. The author highlighted the importance of taking care of content creators, regardless of their subscriber count.
8. They emphasized the need for better communication between YouTube and its creators.
9. The author mentioned their concern about smaller creators facing similar issues without adequate support.
These are the key factual points from the provided text.