VIAJANTES NO TEMPO QUE FORAM FILMADOS! [+10] - Summary

Summary

The video discusses various cases of supposed time travelers, presenting them as questionable and debunking the claims. It mentions instances like a man with futuristic sunglasses (explained by a vintage design), a woman using a "cell phone" (actually an old hearing aid), and a mysterious device at a Mike Tyson fight in 1995 (unexplained but not evidence of time travel). The video emphasizes that these cases lack substantial proof and should not be taken seriously.

Facts

1. The text discusses the concept of time travel, which is a popular dream for many people.
2. The speaker expresses a desire to go back to school, knowing what they know now.
3. The speaker mentions several cases of people who claimed to have traveled through time, with proof such as filming and photos.
4. The speaker suggests subscribing to the Vanguard channel for more information on this topic.
5. The speaker mentions that physics does not deny the possibility of time travel, but the necessary technology does not exist yet.
6. The speaker discusses the possibility of traveling forward in time, using the example of the Flash and a hypothetical situation where he travels at the speed of light for a year.
7. The speaker discusses a case of a man who claimed to have traveled in time and visited the year 6000.
8. The speaker debunks a claim of a man who claimed to have traveled in time and visited the year 6000, stating that the Apex TV channel, to which the man gave an interview, is known for inventing sensationalist and bizarre stories.
9. The speaker discusses a case of a woman who was filmed talking on what appeared to be a cell phone in 1938.
10. The speaker debunks the claim of the woman by stating that the device she was using was a hearing aid, which was common at the time.
11. The speaker discusses a case of a device that appeared to be a smartphone or a more technological camera during a Mike Tyson fight in 1995.
12. The speaker debunks the claim by stating that the device used in the video could not have been a smartphone, as smartphones did not exist until 1997.