Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Title:** (Implied) Falsely Banned from a Gaming Tournament
**Summary:**
* The author is suddenly banned from a gaming tournament (specifically, a Modern Arsenal game) with a 365-day penalty for alleged "Aimbot" usage.
* They claim to be innocent, citing that their gameplay was visible to all, and suspect foul play.
* The ban occurred after they won against an opponent, who then brought in a moderator ("mod") friend, leading the author to believe the ban was unjust and motivated by the opponent's loss.
* The author reflects on the incident, questioning the evidence used for the ban and the fairness of the moderation.
* The video (implied to be a recording of the gaming session and post-ban discussion) ends with the author inviting viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, numbered and in short sentences:
1. The speaker's account was banned for 365 days (initially stated, later mentioned as 465 days) for allegedly using an aimbot.
2. The ban was issued by "Iraq" (likely a moderator or admin, not the country).
3. The speaker claims the ban was false and they didn't use an aimbot.
4. The incident occurred during a tournament hosted by the speaker's friend.
5. The speaker was playing on an alternate (alt) account during the tournament.
6. The speaker enjoys playing on alt accounts in tournaments to be an "underdog".
7. Other players in the tournament accused the speaker of using ESP (Extra Sensory Perception) or aimbot cheats.
8. A friend with a "mod" (moderator) account was consulted to review the clip and potentially ban the accused cheater.
9. The speaker was eventually banned mid-tournament, leading to their disqualification.
10. The speaker is unsure what proof led to their ban and expresses concerns about the banning process.
11. The banned account was an alternate account, which lessened the speaker's concern about the ban.