Here is a concise summary of the provided text, which appears to be a transcript of a video review:
**Title:** Pizza Review in Paris
**Summary:**
* The host reviews two pizza places in Paris as part of a "worst to best" series.
* **First Restaurant ( unnamed):**
+ Described as a "tourist trap"
+ Pizza was disappointing, with a bad dough, lack of finesse, and poor seasoning
* **Second Restaurant (Anadefi):**
+ Praised for its excellence, with a magnificent pizza crust, subtle smoke flavor, and high-quality toppings
+ Host declares it the "best pizza I have eaten in my life"
* The video ends with an invitation for viewers to subscribe, provide feedback, and suggest future review ideas.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, without opinions, in short sentences with numbers:
1. The speaker is reviewing two restaurants in relation to their pizza.
2. The first restaurant's pizza costs almost €12.
3. The first restaurant's mozzarella salad costs almost €8.
4. The speaker ordered a "Vinci Pizza" at the first restaurant.
5. The first restaurant is described as relatively touristy.
6. The speaker also ordered a "51 Anchor and Tomato" dish (possibly a salad) for almost €8 at the first restaurant.
7. The second restaurant is called "Anadefi".
8. Anadefi has a pizza called "Vesuvius" with 24-month matured parmesan shavings.
9. The "Vesuvius" pizza at Anadefi costs €17.
10. The speaker highly praises the pizza crust at Anadefi.
11. Anadefi also serves burrata.
12. The speaker will provide more details about Anadefi in the video's description.
13. There are multiple locations of Anadefi in Paris.
14. The speaker invites viewers to suggest specialties to try in the comments.
15. The next video will be uploaded on the following Friday at 6:18 p.m.