Here is a concise summary of the provided transcript:
**Incident Summary:**
* An altercation occurred at a store, involving a customer, store employees, and security guards.
* The situation escalated, with accusations of provocation, physical altercations, and potential weapon involvement (a "blue stick" or "hanger").
* Police were involved, with some individuals being detained or questioned.
* Filming was attempted, but at times prohibited by authorities.
**Key Points:**
* Multiple parties were involved, including a security guard, store employees, customers, and police.
* Allegations of physical violence, verbal provocation, and potential weapon use were made.
* Authorities' actions (e.g., detention, filming prohibitions) were questioned by those involved.
* The incident was recorded and is being shared to "publicize this store" and potentially seek support or justice.
**Context Limitations:**
Note that the transcript appears to be a recorded conversation or video commentary with timestamps, but without additional context (e.g., location, prior events, or participant backgrounds). This summary provides an overview of the incident based solely on the provided transcript.
Here are the extracted key facts, each numbered and in short sentences, excluding opinions:
**Note:** Some sentences were rephrased for clarity while maintaining their factual content.
1. A woman was taken to a department, along with a security guard.
2. Filming was allowed in the location.
3. A police officer, Lukoyanov, was present.
4. A person's finger was injured, with some hearing an obscene comment related to it.
5. Someone was detained, with questions raised about the legality of the detention.
6. The police refused to return a child promptly, citing the need to follow the law.
7. An incident occurred in a store, involving a seller and customers.
8. A police officer mentioned Article 19 of the federal law on police.
9. A saleswoman was involved in a confrontation, reportedly hitting someone with a stick.
10. A security guard was working on the premises during the incident.
11. No theft occurred, according to one of the parties involved.
12. A jacket was at the center of a dispute.
13. A video was mentioned as evidence of the events.
14. The police were considering taking children away from the scene.
15. An individual, Dmitry, was mentioned as a duty officer.
16. A statement was being written on the street in front of a district police officer.
17. Someone was accused of intentionally causing a montage of events.
18. A person was described as being under the influence of drugs.
19. A "blue stick" or weapon was discussed in relation to an incident.
20. The incident was being documented for public awareness, with a request for likes and reposts.
**Contextual Note for Clarification:**
- The documents appear to be transcripts from an audio or video recording, possibly of a confrontation or incident involving police, security guards, and individuals in a public place (mentioned as a store).
- The numbering of the facts corresponds to the sequential appearance of new, distinct information across the provided documents.