Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Trial Verdict:**
A jury found Amber Heard liable for defaming ex-husband Johnny Depp in a 2018 op-ed, ordering her to pay over $10 million in damages. Heard won one of three counterclaims, receiving $2 million.
**Post-Trial Interview:**
Depp's lawyers, Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chu, discussed the verdict, stating:
* Depp felt overwhelming relief after the verdict
* The jury's decision was unanimous, indicating the evidence favored Depp
* They deny claims of an orchestrated social media campaign supporting Depp
* The jury was not swayed by external influences, having been admonished daily
* Heard's lack of accountability for her actions may have contributed to the jury's decision
**Broader Implications:**
The lawyers downplay the trial's larger resonance, emphasizing it was about the specific case. They express confidence in withstanding Heard's planned appeal.
**Personal Note:**
The interview concludes with the lawyers reflecting on their newfound fame, with Camille Vasquez mentioning the experience as "overwhelming" and "surreal," but hoping to inspire young women to pursue legal careers. She also confirms her recent promotion to partner.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, numbered and in short sentences:
1. A jury found in favor of Johnny Depp in his defamation case against ex-wife Amber Heard.
2. The verdict was delivered after a trial watched by millions worldwide.
3. Amber Heard was ordered to pay over $10 million in damages to Johnny Depp.
4. Heard won one of three claims in her counter-lawsuit against Depp, receiving $2 million in damages.
5. Heard plans to appeal the verdict.
6. The trial lasted for an extended period, including a 10-day break due to a judicial conference.
7. Johnny Depp's lawyers, Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chu, became public figures during the trial.
8. The jury found Depp responsible for defamation for one statement made by his lawyer.
9. The defamatory statement accused Amber Heard of staging a scene in furtherance of an abuse hoax.
10. A UK court previously ruled against Depp in a similar defamation case against a newspaper.
11. Depp's lawyers claim the US trial presented overwhelming evidence not seen in the UK case.
12. The jury was composed of seven people who delivered a unanimous verdict (except for the one claim mentioned in #8).
13. Amber Heard's attorney alleged the jury didn't see certain evidence (e.g., therapist notes) that could have supported Heard's claims.
14. Depp's lawyers deny any evidence was suppressed for invalid reasons.
15. Online support for Johnny Depp far exceeded that for Amber Heard, with "Justice for Johnny Depp" receiving 20 billion views on TikTok.
16. Heard's attorneys suggested an orchestrated online campaign might have influenced public opinion in Depp's favor.
17. Depp's team categorically denies any involvement in an online campaign.
18. Camille Vasquez was promoted to partner following the trial.