Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Title:** Successfully Rickrolling YouTube Support
**Summary:**
* The creator received a YouTube copyright claim for using "Never Gonna Give You Up" (Rick Astley's song) in a video.
* Instead of appealing through the standard YouTube process, they emailed YouTube support (available only to creators with over 100,000 subscribers).
* The creator, pretending to dispute the claim, engaged with support agent "Daryl", providing a Dropbox link to the supposedly disputed song.
* Unbeknownst to Daryl, the link led directly to the start of "Never Gonna Give You Up", effectively Rickrolling YouTube support.
* The creator takes pride in achieving this, considering it a notable accomplishment, and shares the story with their audience.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, each with a number and in short sentence form, excluding opinions:
1. The author received a YouTube copyright claim for using the song "Never Gonna Give You Up".
2. The song is often used for "Rickrolling" people.
3. The copyright claim was for a video that allegedly used the song without permission.
4. The author appealed the claim through YouTube's direct creator support page (available for channels with over 100,000 subscribers).
5. The author initially contacted YouTube support, pretending the claim was incorrect.
6. YouTube support (represented by "Darrell") responded, explaining the claim process.
7. The author was told they could dispute the claim with the copyright owner or through YouTube.
8. To facilitate the dispute, the author was asked to provide documentation of the video and the claimed song.
9. The author uploaded a file to Dropbox, which actually contained the song "Never Gonna Give You Up", effectively Rickrolling YouTube support.
10. Darrell, unaware, requested clarification on the dispute's legitimacy before discovering the Rickroll.
11. The author was then sent a review form to rate their experience with YouTube support.
12. The author had previously commissioned a custom-made remix for the video in question, which was not the song initially claimed.