Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Title:** Frustrations of a YouTube Animator with Content Theft and Platform Inequality
**Key Points:**
1. **Content Theft:** The animator spent over a year creating a video, only to have it stolen and reposted on Facebook without permission, earning them minimal revenue ($28).
2. **Platform Inequality:** YouTube's algorithm favors native content, while Facebook's design incentivizes reposting, protecting content thieves, and hurting original creators.
3. **Monetization Struggles:** As an animator, the creator faces long production times, making it hard to produce frequent content, leading to sporadic viewership and revenue (e.g., $0 for nearly 1 million views).
4. **Critique of YouTube:** Despite YouTube's efforts to safeguard creators, the platform's system can be imperfect, particularly for animators, with no straightforward solution for their unique challenges.
5. **Financial Reality:** The animator earns significantly below average ($65 per million views), exacerbated by content theft.
**Tone and Conclusion:** The animator expresses frustration and legitimate anger, yet remains neutral on YouTube's efforts, while discouraging others from pursuing a similar path as an independent YouTube animator.
Here are the extracted key facts, each with a number and in short sentences, excluding opinions:
1. **Video Creation Time**: The video took over a year to make (525 days of scripting, recording, animating, editing, and generating data).
2. **Initial Video Stats**: Initially, the video had 35,000 views and 28 [likes/comments, etc.] on YouTube by July 17, 2020.
3. **Facebook Page Repost**: On July 18, 2020, a Facebook page ("fans.of.csgo") reposted the video without the creator's knowledge or consent.
4. **Facebook Repost Description**: The Facebook repost included a description with "creds to cs ghost animation".
5.. **Copyright Infringement Report**: The creator reported the Facebook repost for copyright infringement.
6. **YouTube Monetization Process**: To monetize on YouTube, creators must meet certain qualifications, which are then reviewed by a human moderator.
7. **YouTube vs. Facebook Monetization**: YouTube pays more for embedded video views than Facebook for directly uploaded videos.
8. **Facebook's Video Sharing Policy**: Facebook forces users to leave the platform to watch YouTube videos, rather than embedding them, to keep users on Facebook longer.
9. **YouTube's Content Protection**: YouTube has an automatic system to detect and stop reposted content, with a strike system for violators.
10. **Facebook's Content Reporting Process**: Reporting copyright infringement on Facebook requires the original creator to file a report, which is then reviewed by a human moderator.
11. **Consequences for Facebook Reposters**: Facebook pages reposting copyrighted content without permission face no consequences after the content is eventually deleted.
12. **Video Licensing for Protection**: Some creators use video licensing to protect their content from freebooting.
13. **Creator's Earnings**: The creator earned $28 from 35,000 views before the video was reposted on Facebook.
14. **Loss After Facebook Repost**: The creator's earnings per million views decreased to $65 after the Facebook repost.
15. **YouTube's Review Process for Recommendations**: Getting a video recommended on YouTube involves a review process that can take days, weeks, or months.
16. **Creator's Video Production Timeframe**: As an animator, the creator spends months to years making a single video, unlike vloggers.
17. **Current Earnings per View**: The creator earns $81 per million views, which is below average, and this decreased further due to the Facebook repost.
18. **Subscriber Milestone**: The creator has reached 10,000 subscribers on YouTube.