Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Topic:** Controversy surrounding Bright Ocular, a company offering illegal eye color changing surgery
**Background:**
* The creator previously made a video exposing the company and a model who faked an eye condition, featuring patients who suffered from the surgery
* The video was initially taken down due to a "shifty takedown notice" but was re-uploaded without issue
**Current Development:**
* The creator received a lengthy email from Bright Ocular, accusing them of spreading misinformation and slandering the company
* The email claimed patients didn't follow post-surgery instructions, despite contradictory evidence from the patients themselves
* Patients, including one who almost went blind, confirm the company's wrongdoing and acknowledge the video's impact in canceling hundreds of appointments, costing the company millions
**Creator's Response:**
* Initially postponed making another video due to anger, but decided to address the situation again
* Stands by the original video's content, backed by eye doctors' research, and refuses to edit or remove it
* Will continue to speak out against injustices, even if faced with potential backlash
**Video Conclusion:**
* The rest of the video (approximately half) is dedicated to the creator opening fan mail and gifts from viewers, unrelated to the Bright Ocular controversy.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, keeping each fact as a short sentence and excluding opinions:
1. The creator previously made a video about a model who faked an eye condition for sympathy.
2. The model underwent an illegal eye color lens surgery in India to maintain the deception.
3. The surgery was performed by a company called Bright Ocular.
4. Dr. Stark stated that the surgery can cause pieces of the iris to float inside the eye, leading to severe glaucoma, a potentially blinding procedure.
5. The creator received a takedown notice for the video four days after upload, which they resolved by re-uploading the video.
6. A week later, the creator received a lengthy email from Bright Ocular regarding the video.
7. Bright Ocular claimed that two patients featured in the video had not followed post-surgery instructions, leading to complications.
8. One of the patients, a self-described "happy customer" of Bright Ocular, is partially blind and shared her story on YouTube.
9. The creator was in contact with one of the patients, Patty, who almost went blind from the surgery.
10. Patty reported being threatened by Bright Ocular, which claimed it would sue for defamation.
11. Patty stated that hundreds of people canceled their appointments with Bright Ocular due to the negative experiences shared online.
12. The creator initially postponed making another video about Bright Ocular but decided to address the situation again.