Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Title:** Debunking Denials of "Putin's Palace" (Project "re:vision")
**Context:** Alexei Navalny's viral video (110M+ views) exposed Vladimir Putin's alleged luxury "palace" near Gelendzhik, sparking widespread reactions, including denials from pro-government media.
**Key Points:**
1. **Denial tactics**: Pro-Kremlin media claimed the palace is unfinished, lacks luxurious features, and doesn't belong to Putin.
2. **Counter-evidence**:
* Photos from 2011 show a completed gate and golden eagles.
* GPS spoofing and a no-fly zone (similar to those over Putin's official residence) suggest high-level involvement.
* Federal Protective Service (FSO) presence, confirmed by environmentalists and contractors' websites, indicates a state-owned facility.
3. **Questionable denials**:
* Businessman Arkady Rotenberg's claim of ownership is dubious, given his close ties to Putin.
* Pro-Kremlin media's linguistic "expertise" is discredited.
4. **Conclusion**: Denials of Putin's connection to the palace are unconvincing, and journalists should seek answers rather than falsify facts.
**Project "re:vision"**: Aims to analyze rumors, fake news, and propaganda, inviting viewers to engage and suggest future topics.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text, numbered and in short sentences:
1. **Video Views**: Alexei Navalny's film about Vladimir Putin's alleged "palace" has over 110 million views on Russian YouTube.
2. **Global Reaction**: Reactions to the video have come from all over the world.
3. **Russian Awareness**: Over a quarter of Russians have seen the video, and another 42% have heard of it.
4. **Youth Engagement**: The video's engagement numbers are exceptionally high among young people in Russia.
5. **Navalny's Claim**: Navalny claims the palace near Gelendzhik belongs to Putin, showing it in a video.
6. **Pro-Government Response**: Pro-government media produced dozens of rebuttal stories against Navalny's claims.
7. **Sociological Response**: A third of Russians who have seen the video do not believe Navalny.
8. **Previous Ownership Claims**: Businessman Arkady Rotenberg has claimed the facility is his, not a palace, but an apartment hotel.
9. **Rotenberg's Ties to Putin**: Rotenberg has been a close friend of Putin's since his youth.
10. **No-Fly Zone**: A no-fly zone was established over the palace in the summer of 2020, cited as due to increased NATO activity.
11. **Height of No-Fly Zone**: The no-fly zone is approximately 4 km above the ground, unusually high compared to similar zones in the region.
12. **Comparison to Other No-Fly Zones**: The height matches the no-fly zone above the official Russian presidential residence in Sochi.
13. **GPS Spoofing**: Evidence of GPS spoofing, a technique used to hide state and military objects, has been detected around the palace.
14. **FSO Involvement**: The Federal Protective Service (FSO), which guards state-owned facilities, has been linked to the palace's security.
15. **Historical FSO Confirmation**: In 2011, environmentalists were detained by individuals identifying themselves as FSO officers at the palace.
16. **Documentary Evidence**: Drawings of the residence approved by the FSO staff and contractor websites listing work for the "residence of the President of the Russian Federation" in Praskoveevka have been found.
17. **Supplier Information**: Suppliers have listed the palace among presidential residences they have worked with, alongside the Kremlin and other known presidential facilities.
18. **Official Denials**: Putin and the FSO have denied the palace's connection to Putin or the state.